User:BrianSchweitzer/Conductor Relationship Type Proposal: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
|attributeDescription1 = There is currently no guideline for this attribute. Until a guideline is made official, it is suggested that this be used to record places where you normally wouldn't expect the conductor to contribute.
|attributeDescription1 = There is currently no guideline for this attribute. Until a guideline is made official, it is suggested that this be used to record places where you normally wouldn't expect the conductor to contribute.
|attributePage1 = Additional Relationship Attribute
|attributePage1 = Additional Relationship Attribute

|attributeName2 = orchestra
|attributeDescription2 = This indicates the type of orchestra which was conducted. This should only be used if the conductor did '''not''' conduct all of the performers.
|attributePage2 = Orchestra Relationship Attribute

|attributeName3 = vocal
|attributeDescription3 = This indicates the type of vocals or choir which was conducted. This should only be used if the conductor did '''not''' conduct all of the performers.
|attributePage3 = Vocal Relationship Attribute

|attributeName4 = instrument
|attributeDescription4 = This indicates the type of instruments or instrument section which was conducted. This should only be used if the conductor did '''not''' conduct all of the performers.
|attributePage4 = Instrument Relationship Attribute


|summary = This indicates an [[Artist|artist]] who conducted a performance.
|summary = This indicates an [[Artist|artist]] who conducted a performance.

Revision as of 08:59, 28 March 2010


Status: This page describes an active advanced relationship proposal and is not official.



Proposal number: RFC-106
Champion: BrianFreud
Current status: Pre-RFC
Initial Discussion



Template:Relationship