User:BrianSchweitzer/Proposal/Soundtrack Style: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Imported from MoinMoin))
 
((Imported from MoinMoin))
Line 26: Line 26:


Personally, I'm of the opinion that most of SoundtrackStyle should just go away. The only time most people look for the composer in a soundtrack is if the soundtrack is instrumental, and in many of those cases the composer is already defined as the [[Primary Artist|PrimaryArtist]] by other style guides. [[Sailor Leo|SailorLeo]]
Personally, I'm of the opinion that most of SoundtrackStyle should just go away. The only time most people look for the composer in a soundtrack is if the soundtrack is instrumental, and in many of those cases the composer is already defined as the [[Primary Artist|PrimaryArtist]] by other style guides. [[Sailor Leo|SailorLeo]]
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Totally disagree. That may be your main reason, but far and way it's not a universal reason why people would want composer info for a soundtrack. Also, many soundtracks, that composition may contain vocals, and even when it doesn't, for instrumental tracks, it's debatable in many cases that it could be considered "classical", and thus no style guides would otherwise apply. -- [[Brian Schweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 01:26, 06 August 2007 (UTC)
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">Totally disagree. That may be your main reason, but far and away it's not a universal reason why people would want composer info for a soundtrack. Also, many soundtracks, that composition may contain vocals, and even when it doesn't, for instrumental tracks, it's debatable in many cases that it could be considered "classical", and thus no style guides would otherwise apply. -- [[Brian Schweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 01:26, 06 August 2007 (UTC)
</ul>
</ul>



Revision as of 01:26, 6 August 2007

These ProposedStyleGuidelines apply to soundtracks for:

  • Movies
  • Television Shows
  • Video Games
  • Theatrical Productions

Basic Guidelines

  • A separate style guide already exists for SoundtrackTitleStyle. In summary, the title is the title of the movie, musical, or video game. Additional information is only added if necessary to distinguish between multiple soundtracks.
  • For music written for the soundtrack, Artist should contain the composer, not the performer.
    • Where performer information is available, it should be indicated using AdvancedRelationships. Such music is often referred to as the "score" - especially if it is instrumental.
  • For music from other sources used in a soundtrack, Artist should be handled according as it would for any compilation. Thus:
    • For pre-existing classical music used on soundtracks, Artist should contain the composer in accordance with the ClassicalStyleGuide.
    • For pre-existing non-classical music, Artist should contain the performers.
      • Exception: For "tribute" soundtracks where all the music was previously composed by the same songwriter, see, e.g., De-Lovely or Movin' Out, the artist should contain the songwriter and the performers should be credited using AdvancedRelationships.
  • All releases to which these guidelines apply should be given the ReleaseAttribute "Soundtrack."

Discussion

  • How should we handle cases such as The Simpsons and South Park, would these go under the category of "Music written for the soundtrack" and be listed under the name of the compsosers (assuming they can be found)? This is especially curious for the Simpsons, who have releases of original material as well as soundtracks for the show. Should Go Simpsonic with the Simpsons be placed under the composer's name and be separated from The Simpsons Sing The Blues (despite the fact that they're concidered as being from the same artist), or should all the Simpsons releases be changed, for consistancy, including the non-soundtrack releases? I think that one of the basic things we need to do is say "what is a soundtrack." There's a basic operational definition in the existing style guidelines, but it needs to be clarified with respect to follow-on and related releases like the ones you mention, as well as compilations of music from several works (these last are compilations, not soundtracks). This gets particularly hairy for some of the anime stuff. There was also some recent discussion of "fictional artists" like the Blues Brothers, which may be relevant here. Another issue that we need to think about is composer vs. composer&lyricist as primary artist, especially for musicals. There are many cases (e.g. Lerner and Loewe, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Rodgers and Hart) where the composer and lyricist worked together as partners, no different from a musical group where some members sing and others play drums. In these cases, I think that making the primary artist be the composer alone is not what people want or expect. I know that there are AudioScrobbler users who insist on the primacy of the composer, but in cases such as these well known partnerships, I think that a separate artist for the partnership is the correct approach. @alex
  • In the light of SG5 and the track artist stuff should we still store the entire score under the name of the composer - even when there are hit songs from a film that are performed by a different artist: http://musicbrainz.org/showalbum.html?albumid=105954 Should John Barry or a-ha be the track artist on title track?

Having been working with Disney a week or more long. I see serious difficulties with this proposal. Classical is classical. It is handled as it is and I don't feel I have any grasp whatsoever to make a thought about it. However, Disney is "soundtrack" and therefore handled as a soundtrack. The problems with this is Disney songs are often times utlized on various other Various artists releases all over the place. Perhaps I am reading this wrong. But, pre-existing doesn't seem to fit here. More like, these songs were on a Disney soundtrack first, therefore the "opposite" stands. If they are on a compilation after that, they should then all be changed to the composer. We are playing Salmon, swimming up river. For every time we fix one "Alan Menken" there are another five disc's released with A Whole New World, or Circle of Life, or whatever next popular song comes out on a various hit album. Currently, even after Disney is down from 100+ albums to less than 50 There are at least 50 various artists albums with "A Whole New World" on them, and approximately 20 correctly attributed songs. This is just one song I am speaking about. I haven't yet to do a count on Circle of Life, or the other vastly popular songs from the vastly prolific Disney studios. I think Soundtrack should be handled a lot differently. I proposed a change, to attempt to embrace soundtrack and performance artist all in one lump, this at least wouldn't be quite as apparent that this was a broken situation. As of yet I have not seen any true feedback on that proposal. I would ask for a little research to be put into this, or to consider it. I have suggestions, I will take the time with Disney, but there has to be some end in sight, or once more, I am sure not only will Disney never be done, it will constantly be an eyesore to those that are perfectionists. Nyght

Personally, I'm of the opinion that most of SoundtrackStyle should just go away. The only time most people look for the composer in a soundtrack is if the soundtrack is instrumental, and in many of those cases the composer is already defined as the PrimaryArtist by other style guides. SailorLeo

  • Totally disagree. That may be your main reason, but far and away it's not a universal reason why people would want composer info for a soundtrack. Also, many soundtracks, that composition may contain vocals, and even when it doesn't, for instrumental tracks, it's debatable in many cases that it could be considered "classical", and thus no style guides would otherwise apply. -- BrianSchweitzer 01:26, 06 August 2007 (UTC)