Difference between revisions of "User:Hrglgrmpf/Artist Ranking"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
The idea is to have a ranking of artists, based on partly objective criteria. The reason for this is more fun to clean up artists (like: I want to have my favorite band be fully cleaned up, and let others know). These artists are then also a show case what can be achieved with the full level of MusicBrainz interlinked data!
* unknown: default when creating
 
  +
* bronze: artist info filled in, all external artist links set, duplicate artists merged
 
  +
The proposed criteria are (only for artists that have a discography):
* silver: has "full" discography on overview page (release groups cleaned up), all artist relationships (performs as, band members) set, IPI set
 
 
* unknown: default
* gold: all releases/release groups cleaned up (date, label, barcode, ASIN/discogs)
 
 
* bronze: has "full" discography on overview page (release groups cleaned up), all artist relationships (performs as, band members) set, IPI set for artist and/or all band members
* platinum: all recordings cleaned up (comments for live recordings / recordings with same name, identical ones merged), works cleaned up, every recording is associated with at least one work
 
 
* silver: all releases/release groups cleaned up (date, label, barcode, ASIN/discogs links)
* diamond: all external links set (lyrics, allmusic, discogs, ASIN, ...), all relationships set
 
 
* gold: all recordings cleaned up (comments for live recordings / recordings with same name, identical ones merged), works cleaned up, every recording is associated with at least one work, all works have ISWC if they have any
  +
* platinum: all external links set (lyrics, allmusic, discogs, ASIN, ...), all relationships set (writer, composer, ...); in this state nothing more can be done for the artist, except when musicbrainz gets new features or new releases appear.
   
   
 
= Groups =
 
= Groups =
   
== Platinum ==
+
== Gold ==
   
 
* [[Artist:f1b4fda6-a681-4f63-a9a3-bd9b219e09cf|Esben and the Witch]]
 
* [[Artist:f1b4fda6-a681-4f63-a9a3-bd9b219e09cf|Esben and the Witch]]

Revision as of 21:12, 24 August 2011

The idea is to have a ranking of artists, based on partly objective criteria. The reason for this is more fun to clean up artists (like: I want to have my favorite band be fully cleaned up, and let others know). These artists are then also a show case what can be achieved with the full level of MusicBrainz interlinked data!

The proposed criteria are (only for artists that have a discography):

  • unknown: default
  • bronze: has "full" discography on overview page (release groups cleaned up), all artist relationships (performs as, band members) set, IPI set for artist and/or all band members
  • silver: all releases/release groups cleaned up (date, label, barcode, ASIN/discogs links)
  • gold: all recordings cleaned up (comments for live recordings / recordings with same name, identical ones merged), works cleaned up, every recording is associated with at least one work, all works have ISWC if they have any
  • platinum: all external links set (lyrics, allmusic, discogs, ASIN, ...), all relationships set (writer, composer, ...); in this state nothing more can be done for the artist, except when musicbrainz gets new features or new releases appear.


Groups

Gold