User:HumHumXX: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(56 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://musicbrainz.org/user/HumHumXX MusicBrainz] | [http://forums.musicbrainz.org/profile.php?id=3429 MusicBrainz Forums] | [http://www.last.fm/user/HumHumXX Last.fm]
Also: [[user:HumHumXX/bla|Wiki Bla]] | [http://musicbrainz.org/user/HumHumXX MusicBrainz] | [https://community.metabrainz.org/u/HumHumXX MusicBrainz Forums] | [http://www.last.fm/user/HumHumXX Last.fm]


'''To Do:''' Mend record player, clean all records, re-add collection, then watch it. Moan, whine, bitch and complain during every stage.
----
----
'''Modest proposals:'''
* Warn, then ban exceptionally bad editors (more than 5% down-voted edits and/or no reaction to other editors' notes).
* Highlight new editors, maybe on the front page. (BTW, why are people following auto-editors' edits, not those of new editors, who actually do need supervision?)
* Get rid of "Yes" and "Abstain", introduce "Ignore" or "Don't Care" as a voting option; auto-editors should still be able to approve edits.
* Mark accepted releases that have not been voted on as such, if possible even retrospectively; let editors additionally mark releases that have issues and serious issues. A note addressing the (potential) problem should be obligatory.
* Revoke auto-editor privileges after, say, one year of inactivity. They should be able to apply for getting them back by simply posting to the list -- or the forums, see also below.


=== Voting ===


Open edits merging ...
* Let a bot adjust release group titles/artists to release titles/artists if there's only one release in a release group, or if there's two or more releases that are identical in those respects.
* [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=4&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=&field=Please+choose+a+condition artists], [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=14&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=388788&field=Please+choose+a+condition labels]
* Let it do the same for recordings ... -- yeah, I know.
* [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=74&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=388788&field=Please+choose+a+condition recordings], [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=44&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=388788&field=Please+choose+a+condition works]
* (... or, regarding artists, disable release group/recording artist ''credits''; except for collaborations, of course.)
* [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=225%2C223%2C311&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=&field=Please+choose+a+condition releases], [https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=24&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=388788&field=Please+choose+a+condition release groups]


[https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=editor&conditions.1.operator=not_me&conditions.1.name=HumHumXX&conditions.1.args.0=&conditions.2.field=vote_count&conditions.2.vote=1&conditions.2.operator=%21%3D&conditions.2.args.0=0&conditions.2.args.1=&conditions.3.field=vote_count&conditions.3.vote=0&conditions.3.operator=%21%3D&conditions.3.args.0=0&conditions.3.args.1=&field=Please+choose+a+condition Open edits that seem to be controversial]


[https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=asc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=status&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.args=1&conditions.1.field=type&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=220%2C54&conditions.1.args=13&conditions.1.args=17%2C262&conditions.1.args=53&conditions.1.args=73&conditions.1.args=23&conditions.1.args=36&conditions.2.field=editor&conditions.2.operator=not_me&conditions.2.name=HumHumXX&conditions.2.args.0=388788&field=Please+choose+a+condition Open edits removing stuff I somewhat care and know about]
* Except for the artist or label level, do not allow linking to websites other than those that can guarantee stable links -- in short, death to purchase, download, discography ARs, etc., if they weren't dead already.
* The remaster ARs are all useless and/or wrong, and I'm only slightly exaggerating. Get rid. No report, no fixing, get rid. Seriously. Maybe add an attribute instead.
* Attributes! (I'll need to further elaborate on this on another occasion.)


=== Editing ===


[[user:HumHumXX/Bach_on_TELDEC]]
* Add "Series" as an option for labels instead of adding a hyper-complicated architecture for such a trivial concept.
* Retain "Bootlegger" and "Holding" as label types, maybe "Publisher" as well, but remove the rest, unless ...
* we let editors add companies (for (c) and (p), manufacturing, etc.). This is also the only way a meaningful parent/sub-label hierarchy can be established.


[[user:HumHumXX/Bach_-_Premium_Edition]] (dump)


[[user:HumHumXX/Bach_-_Bach_2000:_The_Complete_Bach_Edition]] (dump)
* Do not show artist disambiguations except in search results.
* Only show "core" edits to an entity in its editing history; for instance, *no* recording edits in a release history.


=== Queries ===


[https://musicbrainz.org/search?query=%2B%28%22disc+1%22+%7C%7C+%22disc+2%22%29+-bonus+%2Btype%3Asingle+-country%3A%28GB+%7C%7C+JP+%7C%7C+XE+%7C%7C+XW%29&type=release&limit=100&method=advanced Most of these are/should be (part of) UK singles pairs.] (✓, 2014-07-22)
* Close the user *and* the style mailing list, move to the forums. The regular internet user these days has no idea what a mailing list is, and they're clearly not missing out on anything.
* Point users to IRC for the quick question, to the forums for more complicated concerns.


[https://musicbrainz.org/search?query=%2Btype%3Asingle+%2Bformat%3ACD+%2Bmediums%3A2+%2Bcountry%3A%28GB+%7C%7C+XE%29&type=release&limit=100&method=advanced Most of these shouldn't have been merged, and must now be split again.] (✓, 2014-07-22)


[http://musicbrainz.org/search?page=1&query=%2Bdisc+-mediums%3A1&type=release&limit=25&method=advanced Multi-disc releases with legacy disc #s] (✓, 2014-09-17)
* What exactly is the use of the docs and the transclusion mechanism? Why not use the wiki and simply lock the pages that need RFCs to be changed?


* ...

Latest revision as of 14:49, 28 March 2022