Difference between revisions of "User:LordSputnik/Proposals/Style/Recording"
|Line 40:||Line 40:|
[[Recording]] is . In many cases, a track will be the original a performance. However, there are some important cases to consider where this is not true - these are discussed in the following section.
Revision as of 13:55, 14 April 2013
|Status: This page describes an active style guideline proposal and is not official.|
JIRA ticket http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-208
This proposal implements the changes to recordings discussed in the three recordings meetings held during January 2013. The meetings were open to all of the MusicBrainz community, and issues were discussed thoroughly, so any criticism of this proposal should hopefully be focused on the wording, and not the principles.
This proposal replaces the current Recording Style Guideline with the new revision in the section below.
- 1 Recording Name
- 2 Recording Artist
- 3 Disambiguation Comment
- 4 Using Recordings
- 5 Merging Recordings
- 6 Examples
See the title guidelines for how to enter the recording's title.
The recording artist should be the main artist involved in the creation of the recording. Usually, this will be the performer of the song, but it could also be the artist that remixed or recorded the recording.
A disambiguation comment should be used to identify distinguishing features of a recording where two or more recordings share the same name.
In the specific case of live recordings, the naming format from live bootlegs should be used.
- Train in Vain (live, 1998-12-14: Telewest Arena, Newcastle, UK)
- Wake Up (live, Los Angeles, CA, USA)
- The Dance (live, 2002)
- Candle in the Wind (single edit) (live)
A Recording is the result of mixing and/or editing one or more audio tracks. In many cases, a released track will be the original Recording produced from a performance. However, there are some important cases to consider where this is not true - these are discussed in the following section.
Different performances of the same work should always be given separate recordings, no matter how similar they may sound. This applies to both studio performances and live performances.
Different Recordings of the Same Performance
This section mostly applies to live bootleg recordings. Different audio recordings of the same performance will always result in different audio. A new MusicBrainz Recording should be created for each mix of a performance using different audio recordings.
Remixes and Remasters
The audio tracks from an existing mix can be taken and used as the basis for a new mix, which will be a remix of the existing mix. Remixes may also be referred to as dubs, versions and mixes - in those cases these guidelines still apply.
Remixing involves mixing the performance to make it sound different to the original mix. Remixes can be made for a variety of different purposes, such as making the song more appealing to a certain audience, or refreshing the audio of an older mix to attempt to make it sound better. If there is evidence to suggest that a track is a remix, it should always be given its own recording in the database.
Remastered tracks generally feature the original mix of a performance with different mastering applied. This means that they should mostly use the recording for the original mix. The exception to this is where a track labelled as a remaster is in fact a remix - in this case, follow the remix guidelines above.
An edit is a mix that has been restructured. This is different to a remix, because making an edit doesn't involve using the audio tracks of the old mix.
An edit is created by adding or removing sections to or from the mix, or lengthening or shortening sections. Examples include removing an intro, outro, verses, bridges or interludes or censoring some of the content - these changes are commonly in a radio edit. Another example is when a portion of a mix is used, perhaps just one section. Extended edits can also be produced by repeating parts of the mix. Where a fade is used during the first or last section, this is not an edit, as the section is not removed.
Although making an edit does not involve mixing, it does involve editing the master audio track, so, in the context of MusicBrainz, the resulting edit can be considered a new mix. As such, where there is evidence that a track is an edit, it should use a different recording to the original mix.
Number of Audio Channels
It may be the case that similar mixes of a performance have different numbers of audio channels. The most common audio channel configuration is stereo. Stereo mixes will have two audio channels, intended to be played through two speakers (left and right). There are, however, a wide variety of audio channel configuration used in recordings. Mono mixes use only one channel, and were the de facto standard in pop music until the late 1960s. Quadraphonic and surround sound mixes can also be found on audio tracks.
These mixes should generally be distinguished by using separate recordings. An exception to this case is where a mix has been produced by downmixing the audio channels of another mix - for example, where a mono mix has been produced by combining the two channels of a stereo mix. Where a track features a downmix, the recording for the original mix should be on that track. A similar exception should be made where a mono channel has been electronically split into two stereo channels - for example, in Duophonic recordings.
In addition to the above guidelines, it is extremely important to take the following into consideration when thinking of merging recordings.
Recordings with Different Durations
Recordings of different durations can be merged, as long as there is no evidence to suggest that a new mix has been created to change the lengths. Volume fades at the beginning or end of a song are considered mastering and not mixing, unless they cause the structure of the song to change.
For example, Recording A which slowly fades out on the last chorus of a performance can be considered the same as Recording B which has the last chorus at a constant volume. On the other hand, if Recording C of the same performance cut out before the chorus was heard, that would be considered a separate recording to Recording B.
Recordings with Conflicting Relationships
Generally, don't merge recordings if they have conflicting relationships. However, if you're certain that two recordings are the same and relationships are wrong, merge the recordings and correct the relationships.
- When The Beatles' studio albums were originally released as CDs in 1987, they were remastered from the original mixes with the exception of Help! and Rubber Soul, which were remixed. Therefore, in MusicBrainz, A Day in the Life is used on both the 1967 and the 1987 stereo releases of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, while the Yesterday from the original stereo release of Help! is a different recording to the Yesterday from the 1987 CD release.
- There are four studio recordings of the song Don't Push by Sublime. These are four different mixes featuring different raw audio tracks. The recording Don't Push (original) appears on tracks which vary in length from 3:45 to 3:55 because they have been mastered at different speeds. Therefore, the pitch of the audio is different on these tracks, but because there is no difference in mixing they are considered the same recording. The recording Don't Push (album) appears on many releases at different levels of loudness, with differences in dynamic range and with different tonal qualities. However, again there is no evidence that this was the result of mixing and therefore these different tracks are one recording.