User:LordSputnik/Recording Proposals/Conclusions: Difference between revisions
LordSputnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
LordSputnik (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are |
There are five undisputed conclusions that I've drawn from the past three weeks of consultation. These should probably happen for sure, unless something drastically alters everyone's thoughts and opinions (zombie apocalypse/armaggeddon/etc.). |
||
==Tracks should have MBIDs== |
==Tracks should have MBIDs== |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Additional levels should be optional== |
==Additional levels should be optional== |
||
Any levels added to MB shouldn't clutter the existing interface. Most editors should be able to get by using mixes and works. |
Any levels added to MB shouldn't clutter the existing interface. Most editors should be able to get by using mixes and works. |
||
==MusicBrainz needs better documentation== |
|||
In many places current documentation is vague, and several people feel it needs improving. |
Latest revision as of 19:58, 7 January 2013
There are five undisputed conclusions that I've drawn from the past three weeks of consultation. These should probably happen for sure, unless something drastically alters everyone's thoughts and opinions (zombie apocalypse/armaggeddon/etc.).
Tracks should have MBIDs
Many people support tracks being upgraded to have MBIDs. There doesn't seem to be anyone opposed to this.
Recording should become Mix
Eventually, recordings should be redefined as mixes. Mixes should be merged more often than recordings.
More support for lightweight releases
Two people think there needs to be better support for releases with just one track (eg. single-track downloads).
Additional levels should be optional
Any levels added to MB shouldn't clutter the existing interface. Most editors should be able to get by using mixes and works.
MusicBrainz needs better documentation
In many places current documentation is vague, and several people feel it needs improving.