User:MClemo: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
==Edit note templates for my edits==
==Edit note templates for my edits==


===Very low quality classical releases with discid===
===Remove Release: Very low quality classical releases===


<nowiki>
<nowiki>
No edit notes, no release event, no ARs. For classical this makes the release unidentifiable (no performer info). The discid does not justify having those very low quality releases around, possibly forever. Also, the discid may have been added later and have nothing to do with the release it actually is. (Because nobody knows what it is - this is why I make this edit).
No edit notes, no release event, no ARs. For classical this makes the release unidentifiable (no performer info). See edit #10757908 and edit #10761962 for lengthy discussions why those releases are not worth staying in the database.
</nowiki>
</nowiki>



Revision as of 19:17, 9 July 2009

IRC: MClemo | Last.fm: MClemo

Software

  • flac2foo: Transcode flac files to mp3, ogg or aac.

References

Edit note templates for edits of other editors

Add Release: No proof, no release event

Please provide some information that what you are adding has been actually released somewhere. See [HowToWriteEditNotes] about how to write proper edit notes with such proof. I will change my vote after your release has been verified. Also, a [ReleaseEvent] with information about release date, label, barcode and catalog number can be proof itself or lead to good proof.

Edit note templates for my edits

Remove Release: Very low quality classical releases

No edit notes, no release event, no ARs. For classical this makes the release unidentifiable (no performer info). See edit #10757908 and edit #10761962 for lengthy discussions why those releases are not worth staying in the database.


Template:lang de-native Template:lang en-fluent