User:MClemo: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
</nowiki> |
</nowiki> |
||
==Edit note templates for my edits== |
|||
===Remove Release: Very low quality classical releases=== |
|||
<nowiki> |
|||
No edit notes, no release event, no ARs. For classical this makes the release unidentifiable (no performer info). See edit #10757908, edit #10971039, and edit #10761962 for lengthy discussions why those releases are not worth staying in the database. |
|||
</nowiki> |
|||
===Remove Release Group: Empty release group due to clean-up of very low quality classical releases=== |
|||
<nowiki> |
|||
Empty release group due to removing low quality classical release that was once in this release group. |
|||
</nowiki> |
|||
Revision as of 08:40, 11 August 2009
IRC: MClemo | Last.fm: MClemo |
Software
- flac2foo: Transcode flac files to mp3, ogg or aac.
References
- Edits
- edit #7830244: Featuring artists in track names.
- edit #10757908, edit #10971039 & edit #10761962: Removing classical releases of very low quality.
Edit note templates for edits of other editors
Add Release: No proof, no release event
Please provide some information that what you are adding has been actually released somewhere. See [HowToWriteEditNotes] about how to write proper edit notes with such proof. I will change my vote after your release has been verified. Also, a [ReleaseEvent] with information about release date, label, barcode and catalog number can be proof itself or lead to good proof.