User:Practik/Proposal/Error correction and artist intent: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|proposal=STYLE-122
|proposal=STYLE-122
|champion=[[User:Practik]]
|champion=[[User:Practik]]
|status=RFC
|status=RFV
|discussion=http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/On-artist-intent-reasoning-td4634049.html
|discussion=http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/On-artist-intent-reasoning-td4634049.html
|rfc=http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-122-Artist-intent-rewrite-td4635910.html
|rfc=http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-122-Artist-intent-rewrite-td4635910.html

Revision as of 20:14, 19 June 2012


Status: This page describes an active style guideline proposal and is not official.



Proposal number: RFC-STYLE-122
Champion: User:Practik
Current status: RFV
Initial Discussion RFC RFV

JIRA ticket STYLE-122

As a general rule, MusicBrainz editors should correct spelling and punctuation and, to a lesser extent, grammar errors in artists' names, as well as the titles of works, recordings, tracks and releases. However, this rule does not apply if it can be shown that an artist intentionally used unorthodox spelling, punctuation or grammar.

Error Correction

There are many cases of record companies incorrectly reproducing titles or even artist names, or breaking generally accepted rules of usage for stylistic purposes. In such cases it often makes sense to fix errors and standardize irregularities, valuing correct spelling, punctuation and grammar over faithfulness to the printed release cover.

Examples

Artist Intent

Artists sometimes choose to present names and titles in ways that deliberately contradict the rules of the language they're in (e.g. unorthodox spellings) and/or the MusicBrainz Style Guidelines. To describe the way we handle such choices, we use the term "artist intent." The general idea is that if an artist intended something to be written in a special way, then MusicBrainz should follow that intent.

Unfortunately, it can be difficult to find out what an artist intended. If you want to claim that some deviation from the Style Guidelines should be considered artist intent, the burden of proof lies on you. A seeming error may be considered evidence of artist intent if it is consistently found on all of an artist's official releases. The best evidence would be a statement of intent by the artist (e.g. edit 6892422).

Words in Latin script used in Japanese releases present a special case and are generally treated as artist intent; see the Japanese style guidelines for more information.

Examples


Style
Overview
Title Style
Entities
Relationships
Classical
Special Cases/Misc.
Languages