User:Reosarevok/Mini-Album Voting: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
* --[[User:Reosarevok|Reosarevok]] ([[User talk:Reosarevok|talk]]) 18:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
* --[[User:Reosarevok|Reosarevok]] ([[User talk:Reosarevok|talk]]) 18:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
* [[User:Nikki|Nikki]] ([[User talk:Nikki|talk]]) 20:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
* [[User:Nikki|Nikki]] ([[User talk:Nikki|talk]]) 20:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
* [[User:Ianmcorvidae|Ianmcorvidae]] ([[User talk:Ianmcorvidae|talk]]) 21:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


===DO NOT ADD Mini-album===
===DO NOT ADD Mini-album===

Revision as of 21:35, 19 February 2014

An RFC/V for adding mini-album as a release group type got vetoed. Following our proposals process, "the style council" (i.e., the community, basically) should decide what to do - add mini-album, or not?

Before voting, please do check the RFV thread on the style list, which includes the arguments for and against the addition of mini-album, and is here: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-quot-mini-album-quot-primary-type-td4661637.html


ADD Mini-album

DO NOT ADD Mini-album

  • drsaunde Would suggest the alternative of renaming EP to EP/Mini Album
  • Hawke (talk) Yeah, I can’t see any functional difference between the two. Renaming to “EP / mini-album” makes more sense to me as well.