User:Srijan28/guidelines-by-srijan: Difference between revisions
(Guidelines for writing a CritiqueBrainz Review) |
|||
| (21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Guidelines/ Suggestions for CritiqueBrainz review == |
== Guidelines/ Suggestions for CritiqueBrainz review == |
||
There should not be any style guideline for writing the reviews in CritiqueBrainz but there should be a manner for writing the reviews. |
|||
== What is a Review of Music == |
|||
Some of the hints are as follows: |
|||
A review of a musical composition is an evaluation of a publication, service, musical composition (music review of a composition or recording). A compilation of reviews may itself be called a review. |
|||
1. Write the name of the release group(or any other) and write the name of the artist ( you can also add the image of the release group ). |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
A. Elements of a review article |
|||
3. Then you may write what you feel about it ( what are the things that should be improved and what all things are good about it etc.) |
|||
B. Body: Material and Methods |
|||
== A. Elements of a review article == |
|||
== 1.Language == |
|||
A review can be written in any Language but in simple words that should be easy to understand. |
|||
== b.Title == |
|||
The user should write the name of the music and the artist (if it is a single) else the name of the album and the name of the artist. |
|||
== 3.Elements == |
|||
The title must be informative: |
|||
• The title has to include important terms. |
|||
• It has to indicate that the text is a review music. |
|||
The title must be short: |
|||
• Keep the title concise. |
|||
• A longer subtitle may be an option in case a specification is necessary. |
|||
== 4.Tense == |
|||
The review should be written in correct tense. So that other people are able to understand easily the content of your review. |
|||
== 5. Voice == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== 6. Style Guidelines == |
|||
There should not be any Style Guidelines for writing a review. |
|||
== B. Body: Material and Methods == |
|||
== 1.Function == |
|||
Systematic and best evidence reviews have a methods section. This section enables motivated researches to repeat the review. This section include some information about applied methods at the end of the introduction. |
|||
== 2.Elements == |
|||
The material and methods section includes the information about the music that should be written in the review enabling the users to understand your information. |
|||
== 3.Tense == |
|||
Preferably past but in some cases it may be changed as the demand goes. |
|||
== 4.Voice == |
|||
The voice of the review should always be in active voice. |
|||
== 5.Length == |
|||
The length of the review should be (at max.) 5 to 6 paragraphs each paragraph should be briefly explained. |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:23, 31 December 2016
Guidelines/ Suggestions for CritiqueBrainz review
What is a Review of Music
A review of a musical composition is an evaluation of a publication, service, musical composition (music review of a composition or recording). A compilation of reviews may itself be called a review.
A. Elements of a review article
B. Body: Material and Methods
A. Elements of a review article
1.Language
A review can be written in any Language but in simple words that should be easy to understand.
b.Title
The user should write the name of the music and the artist (if it is a single) else the name of the album and the name of the artist.
3.Elements
The title must be informative: • The title has to include important terms.
• It has to indicate that the text is a review music.
The title must be short:
• Keep the title concise.
• A longer subtitle may be an option in case a specification is necessary.
4.Tense
The review should be written in correct tense. So that other people are able to understand easily the content of your review.
5. Voice
A review should always be written in an active voice (easy for the readers to understand).
6. Style Guidelines
There should not be any Style Guidelines for writing a review.
B. Body: Material and Methods
1.Function
Systematic and best evidence reviews have a methods section. This section enables motivated researches to repeat the review. This section include some information about applied methods at the end of the introduction.
2.Elements
The material and methods section includes the information about the music that should be written in the review enabling the users to understand your information.
3.Tense
Preferably past but in some cases it may be changed as the demand goes.
4.Voice
The voice of the review should always be in active voice.
5.Length
The length of the review should be (at max.) 5 to 6 paragraphs each paragraph should be briefly explained.
