User:Srijan28/guidelines-by-srijan: Difference between revisions
| (18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
A review of a musical composition is an evaluation of a publication, service, musical composition (music review of a composition or recording). A compilation of reviews may itself be called a review. |
A review of a musical composition is an evaluation of a publication, service, musical composition (music review of a composition or recording). A compilation of reviews may itself be called a review. |
||
A |
A. Elements of a review article |
||
| ⚫ | |||
B. Body: Material and Methods |
|||
== A) Good to know about review articles == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== 1.What is a review article? == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
• A critical, constructive analysis of the literature in a specific field through summary, classification, analysis, comparison. |
|||
• A scientific text relying on previously published literature or data. New data from the author’s experiments are not presented (with exceptions: some reviews contain new data). |
|||
The user should write the name of the music and the artist (if it is a single) else the name of the album and the name of the artist. |
|||
• A stand-alone publication. Literature reviews as integral parts of master theses, doctoral theses or grant proposals will not be considered here. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
• It has to indicate that the text is a review music. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
• to organize literature |
|||
• to evaluate literature |
|||
• to identify patterns and trends in the literature |
|||
• to synthesize literature |
|||
• to identify research gaps and recommend new research areas |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== 3.Who is the audience of review articles? == |
|||
== 4.Tense == |
|||
• experts in specific research areas |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
• students or novice researchers |
|||
The review should be written in correct tense. So that other people are able to understand easily the content of your review. |
|||
• decision-makers |
|||
== 5. Voice == |
|||
A review should always be written in an active voice (easy for the readers to understand). |
|||
== B) Elements of a review article == |
|||
== 6. Style Guidelines == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== B. Body: Material and Methods == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== |
== 1.Function == |
||
Systematic and best evidence reviews have a methods section. This section enables motivated researches to repeat the review. This section include some information about applied methods at the end of the introduction. |
|||
Function Helping readers to decide whether they should read the text or not. |
|||
== 2.Elements == |
|||
The material and methods section includes the information about the music that should be written in the review enabling the users to understand your information. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
• It has to indicate that the text is a review article. |
|||
• It may include the message of the article, not just its coverage |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== 3.Tense == |
|||
Preferably past but in some cases it may be changed as the demand goes. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
In a title with results indicated: the present tense stresses the general validity of the results and illustrates what the author is trying to achieve with the article; the past tense indicates that results are not established knowledge yet. |
|||
== |
== 4.Voice == |
||
The voice of the review should always be in active voice. |
|||
== |
== 5.Length == |
||
The length of the review should be (at max.) 5 to 6 paragraphs each paragraph should be briefly explained. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Latest revision as of 04:23, 31 December 2016
Guidelines/ Suggestions for CritiqueBrainz review
What is a Review of Music
A review of a musical composition is an evaluation of a publication, service, musical composition (music review of a composition or recording). A compilation of reviews may itself be called a review.
A. Elements of a review article
B. Body: Material and Methods
A. Elements of a review article
1.Language
A review can be written in any Language but in simple words that should be easy to understand.
b.Title
The user should write the name of the music and the artist (if it is a single) else the name of the album and the name of the artist.
3.Elements
The title must be informative: • The title has to include important terms.
• It has to indicate that the text is a review music.
The title must be short:
• Keep the title concise.
• A longer subtitle may be an option in case a specification is necessary.
4.Tense
The review should be written in correct tense. So that other people are able to understand easily the content of your review.
5. Voice
A review should always be written in an active voice (easy for the readers to understand).
6. Style Guidelines
There should not be any Style Guidelines for writing a review.
B. Body: Material and Methods
1.Function
Systematic and best evidence reviews have a methods section. This section enables motivated researches to repeat the review. This section include some information about applied methods at the end of the introduction.
2.Elements
The material and methods section includes the information about the music that should be written in the review enabling the users to understand your information.
3.Tense
Preferably past but in some cases it may be changed as the demand goes.
4.Voice
The voice of the review should always be in active voice.
5.Length
The length of the review should be (at max.) 5 to 6 paragraphs each paragraph should be briefly explained.
