Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jeroen"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
(Added answers.)
(just some reorg before replying)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==A few comments on the method==
 
==A few comments on the method==
[[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
+
* Please create a specific user for all the automated edits, that will then be given a bot status. See e.g. [[Editor:ffimon_bot]]. [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
* Please create a specific user for all the automated edits, that will then be given a bot status. See e.g. [[Editor:ffimon_bot]] - [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) - Ah, I checked for something like this, but could not find anything in the docs. I created [[Editor:JeroenBot]].
+
:* Ah, I checked for something like this, but could not find anything in the docs. I created [[Editor:JeroenBot]]. [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
* Please limit the number of open edits. You saying that your scripts/reports are error prone and that you're ready to react (cancel edit, fix script) each time someone finds a mistake. However if you're flooding the open edits queue, nobody will ever be able to review your edits and the errors will just silently pass. - [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) - What would you propose?
+
* Please limit the number of open edits. You saying that your scripts/reports are error prone and that you're ready to react (cancel edit, fix script) each time someone finds a mistake. However if you're flooding the open edits queue, nobody will ever be able to review your edits and the errors will just silently pass. [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)  
* Do you plan to open the source of your scripts? I'm not interested in running them, but if I'm able to check how you're doing your business, I may be able to spot errors at the source. And I'm not really inclined to trust a black box machine. - [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) - Sure, if it helps. Do you have a proposed way of doing that?
+
:* What would you propose? [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
* Do you really 100% trust Discogs? - [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) - No, of course not, just like I don't 100% trust MusicBrainz. But I make sure that the tools will never repeat the same edit, so if there's a fix, it won't be re-added. It helps that editors are watching the artists they know. By the way, I'm not focusing on Discogs in particular. I think the next data source on my roadmap are the structured infoboxes on Wikipedia.
+
* Do you plan to open the source of your scripts? I'm not interested in running them, but if I'm able to check how you're doing your business, I may be able to spot errors at source. And I'm not really inclined to trust a black box machine. [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
:* Sure, if it helps. Do you have a proposed way of doing that? [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
* Do you really 100% trust Discogs? [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)  
 +
:* No, of course not, just like I don't 100% trust MusicBrainz. But I make sure that the tools will never repeat the same edit, so if there's a fix, it won't be re-added. It helps that editors are watching the artists they know. By the way, I'm not focusing on Discogs in particular. I think the next data source on my roadmap are the structured infoboxes on Wikipedia. [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  
 
==Spotter errors. Are they fixed?==
 
==Spotter errors. Are they fixed?==
[[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
+
 
* [[Edit:12582655]] Two different artists added for only one performance credit - [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC) - Will do that. Nothing is running now, but before I restart I will add a check for common 'ancestors' in the equivalence map.
+
* [[Edit:12582655]] Two different artists added for only one performance credit. [[User:Murdos|Murdos]] 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
:* Will do that. Nothing is running now, but before I restart I will add a check for common 'ancestors' in the equivalence map. [[User:Jeroen|Jeroen]] 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:14, 28 May 2010

A few comments on the method

  • Please create a specific user for all the automated edits, that will then be given a bot status. See e.g. Editor:ffimon_bot. Murdos 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Ah, I checked for something like this, but could not find anything in the docs. I created Editor:JeroenBot. Jeroen 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Please limit the number of open edits. You saying that your scripts/reports are error prone and that you're ready to react (cancel edit, fix script) each time someone finds a mistake. However if you're flooding the open edits queue, nobody will ever be able to review your edits and the errors will just silently pass. Murdos 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • What would you propose? Jeroen 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Do you plan to open the source of your scripts? I'm not interested in running them, but if I'm able to check how you're doing your business, I may be able to spot errors at source. And I'm not really inclined to trust a black box machine. Murdos 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Sure, if it helps. Do you have a proposed way of doing that? Jeroen 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Do you really 100% trust Discogs? Murdos 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • No, of course not, just like I don't 100% trust MusicBrainz. But I make sure that the tools will never repeat the same edit, so if there's a fix, it won't be re-added. It helps that editors are watching the artists they know. By the way, I'm not focusing on Discogs in particular. I think the next data source on my roadmap are the structured infoboxes on Wikipedia. Jeroen 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Spotter errors. Are they fixed?

  • Edit:12582655 Two different artists added for only one performance credit. Murdos 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Will do that. Nothing is running now, but before I restart I will add a check for common 'ancestors' in the equivalence map. Jeroen 16:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)