User talk:LukasLalinsky/Release Groups: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(a few Qs regarding the conversion) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A few questions: Will this be a one-time process, or will the conversion be ongoing? Given that this seemingly makes some ARs redundant, are there some which will need modification and/or removal from the system? (For the second Q specifically, what AR changes will need to be run through RFC/RFV over the summer, prior to the launch of the NGS server, so we can get the AR system changes done, passed, and ready for NGS?) |
A few questions: Will this be a one-time process, or will the conversion be ongoing? Given that this seemingly makes some ARs redundant, are there some which will need modification and/or removal from the system? (For the second Q specifically, what AR changes will need to be run through RFC/RFV over the summer, prior to the launch of the NGS server, so we can get the AR system changes done, passed, and ready for NGS?) |
||
- BrianFreud |
- BrianFreud |
||
: It's a one-time process. Yes, it will make some ARs obsolete, but we can deal with that later. Same for NGS, we will need to add some ARs, remove some ARs. I don't know which ones yet. [[User:LukasLalinsky|Lukáš Lalinský]] 11:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 13 May 2009
A few questions: Will this be a one-time process, or will the conversion be ongoing? Given that this seemingly makes some ARs redundant, are there some which will need modification and/or removal from the system? (For the second Q specifically, what AR changes will need to be run through RFC/RFV over the summer, prior to the launch of the NGS server, so we can get the AR system changes done, passed, and ready for NGS?) - BrianFreud
- It's a one-time process. Yes, it will make some ARs obsolete, but we can deal with that later. Same for NGS, we will need to add some ARs, remove some ARs. I don't know which ones yet. Lukáš Lalinský 11:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)