User talk:Murdos: Difference between revisions
PavanChander (talk | contribs) m (User talk:Murdos moved to User talk:murdos) |
PavanChander (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Edits on [[MusicBrainz Identifier]] == |
== Edits on [[MusicBrainz Identifier]] == |
||
Why shouldn't the URIs have the '.html' extension? Also, can "absolute URI" be changed to just "URI"? --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
<s>Why shouldn't the URIs have the '.html' extension? Also, can "absolute URI" be changed to just "URI"? --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)</s> |
||
: ruaok clarified on IRC that the URIs should have the extension and shouldn't have "absolute". When NGS is released the page can be changed to reflect the appropriate URIs without the extensions.--[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 00:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
And about the various <entity>_ID pages, no one responded to either my or Nikki's comments on [http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/?title=Candidate_for_Deletion/Current&oldid=33060 Candidate_for_Deletion/Current] where we voted for merging the various pages together. I strongly feel that duplicate/redundant information should not be spread out among several pages, especially when the resulting page (not counting header/footer templates) is all of 3 or 4 sentences like it was with these <entity>_ID pages. You mentioned that permanent IDs are an important part of MusicBrainz, and I agree, but I think that if documenting them means just talking about the permanent IDs themselves - and not the entities - then any and all documentation can fit comfortably on [[MusicBrainz Identifier]]. --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
And about the various <entity>_ID pages, no one responded to either my or Nikki's comments on [http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/?title=Candidate_for_Deletion/Current&oldid=33060 Candidate_for_Deletion/Current] where we voted for merging the various pages together. I strongly feel that duplicate/redundant information should not be spread out among several pages, especially when the resulting page (not counting header/footer templates) is all of 3 or 4 sentences like it was with these <entity>_ID pages. You mentioned that permanent IDs are an important part of MusicBrainz, and I agree, but I think that if documenting them means just talking about the permanent IDs themselves - and not the entities - then any and all documentation can fit comfortably on [[MusicBrainz Identifier]]. --[[User:PavanChander|navap]] 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:57, 26 February 2010
Edits on MusicBrainz Identifier
Why shouldn't the URIs have the '.html' extension? Also, can "absolute URI" be changed to just "URI"? --navap 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- ruaok clarified on IRC that the URIs should have the extension and shouldn't have "absolute". When NGS is released the page can be changed to reflect the appropriate URIs without the extensions.--navap 00:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
And about the various <entity>_ID pages, no one responded to either my or Nikki's comments on Candidate_for_Deletion/Current where we voted for merging the various pages together. I strongly feel that duplicate/redundant information should not be spread out among several pages, especially when the resulting page (not counting header/footer templates) is all of 3 or 4 sentences like it was with these <entity>_ID pages. You mentioned that permanent IDs are an important part of MusicBrainz, and I agree, but I think that if documenting them means just talking about the permanent IDs themselves - and not the entities - then any and all documentation can fit comfortably on MusicBrainz Identifier. --navap 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
