Difference between revisions of "User talk:Symphonick/unofficial csg track names"

From MusicBrainz Wiki
(Keys)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Keys==
 
==Keys==
 
As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --[[User:Symphonick|symphonick]] 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 
As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --[[User:Symphonick|symphonick]] 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Single-work releases==
 +
If a release only contains a single work (and is titled after that work), is it necessary to repeat the work name on every single track as well?  I kind of would like to avoid ridiculous tracklists like [http://musicbrainz.org/release/490cfe8e-0cb8-409b-8980-24b6cdbdf13c this].

Revision as of 07:16, 5 July 2011

Note that this is about track & recording names, not CSG Works

Keys

As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --symphonick 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Single-work releases

If a release only contains a single work (and is titled after that work), is it necessary to repeat the work name on every single track as well? I kind of would like to avoid ridiculous tracklists like this.