User talk:Symphonick/unofficial csg track names: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Keys) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Keys== |
==Keys== |
||
As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --[[User:Symphonick|symphonick]] 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --[[User:Symphonick|symphonick]] 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Single-work releases== |
|||
If a release only contains a single work (and is titled after that work), is it necessary to repeat the work name on every single track as well? I kind of would like to avoid ridiculous tracklists like [http://musicbrainz.org/release/490cfe8e-0cb8-409b-8980-24b6cdbdf13c this]. |
Revision as of 07:16, 5 July 2011
Note that this is about track & recording names, not CSG Works
Keys
As I see it, enter keys as on liner: "Suite No. 1 in G, BWV 1007". Standardizing keys is for CSG Works. --symphonick 11:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Single-work releases
If a release only contains a single work (and is titled after that work), is it necessary to repeat the work name on every single track as well? I kind of would like to avoid ridiculous tracklists like this.