no Artist: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (6 revision(s)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In some cases, a track (or possibly even a release) doesn't have a credited performer of any discographic relevance (example: nature sounds releases). These tracks (or releases) should be credited to '''[no artist]'''. |
In some cases, a track (or possibly even a release) doesn't have a credited performer of any discographic relevance (example: nature sounds releases). These tracks (or releases) should be credited to '''[no artist]'''. |
||
==Additional |
==Additional Information== |
||
'''[no artist]''' is a [[Special Purpose Artist|SpecialPurposeArtist]]. |
'''[no artist]''' is a [[Special Purpose Artist|SpecialPurposeArtist]]. |
||
Revision as of 17:54, 15 March 2009
Template:DocumentationHeader Template:ArtistHeader
Description
In some cases, a track (or possibly even a release) doesn't have a credited performer of any discographic relevance (example: nature sounds releases). These tracks (or releases) should be credited to [no artist].
Additional Information
[no artist] is a SpecialPurposeArtist.
For details about when to use (and not use) [no artist], refer to NoArtistStyle.
Please note that [no artist] must not be used in cases where the information is unknown, but exists. For such cases, consult UnknownArtist. There also exists other informally used SpecialPurposeArtists, which may be more appropriate than [no artist] depending on the context, and a special artist as well for DataTracks (the DataTrackArtist).
Example
- 100 Spectacular Sound Effects (disc 3) has ReleaseArtist [no artist]
