Search results

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:10, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:13, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:12, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:54, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:56, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:55, 27 August 2016
  • '''''Note''': This is a proposal. Not all of this process has been adopted yet.'' ...tally 2 different types of branches: schema change branches and non-schema change branches. These branches have different workflows, both of which are docume
    3 KB (582 words) - 14:02, 7 March 2012
  • ...would like to use MBIDs internally to make communication between incoming data sets easier * Will consider sharing partial label feed/data
    13 KB (2,006 words) - 00:33, 1 May 2014
  • ### Events, Venues, Studios (geographical data) ### all kinds of other data and then some
    17 KB (2,972 words) - 11:26, 30 October 2011
  • ...new data repository. This is intended to bridge the gap between a top-down data stream from a label and a bottom-up community like MusicBrainz. Overall the year was somewhat quiet and normal; we had the usual 2 schema change releases and a good Summer of Code. We had our annual summit and took on a
    20 KB (3,043 words) - 12:46, 25 July 2014