Talk:Lyricist Relationship Type: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (splitting discussion) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:ErikDalen|ErikDalen]] |
--[[User:ErikDalen|ErikDalen]] |
||
* When an artist wrote the lyrics of all tracks on the release, should one assign the LyricistRelationshipType to the release only ? -- [[User:jesus2099|jesus2099]] 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC) |
* When an artist wrote the lyrics of all tracks on the release, should one assign the LyricistRelationshipType to the release only ? -- [[User:jesus2099|jesus2099]] 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:* No. [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 14:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:52, 20 March 2010
- When someone wrote both the music and the lyrics, should ComposerRelationshipType, LyricistRelationshipType, or both be used?
- Both. -- jesus2099 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Does "writing lyrics" include writing the melody of the lyrics? Does it include writing the rhythm of the lyrics?
- Melody and rythm are music, thus ComposerRelationshipType is better suited… -- jesus2099 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Should this be used for spoken word tracks? Poems? Recordings of plays?
- I think yes. -- jesus2099 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Should this be used if the person translated the lyrics? Or should it link to the original writer?
- A new LyricsTranslatorRelationshipType would be nice, wouldn't it ? Otherwise, LyricistRelationshipType between track and both original author and translator should be OK, in the meanwhile… -- jesus2099 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- When an artist wrote the lyrics of all tracks on the release, should one assign the LyricistRelationshipType to the release only ? -- jesus2099 09:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- No. BrianSchweitzer 14:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)