User talk:Reosarevok/Recording Issues/Summary
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
This is a summary of the ideas proposals on User talk:Reosarevok/Recording Issues, to be used as a quick reference. All of these summaries are based on my interpretation of the proposal - while I've tried to be as accurate as possible, let me know if I've misunderstood your ideas. For more information please see the individual proposal pages.
Number | Proposer | Link | Summary |
---|---|---|---|
1 | LordSputnik | Link | Create a track entity and a master entity to group tracks. Redefine recordings as mixes, and move most production relationships from recordings and releases to masters. |
2 | Freso | Link | Various modifications to recordings, including: Move AcoustIDs to tracks, have a place to put shared performance relationships, allow cover art for tracks, and use a smarter recording length system. |
3 | Warp | Link | Give tracks MBIDs. Rewrite the recording style guideline to allow more frequent merging, based on recordings corresponding to the "expression" level in FRBR. |
4 | Mudcrow | Link | A recording is a mix. |
5 | Murdos | - | Thinks the current system is happy with the current system. |
6 | reosarevok | - | Would like any new levels to be optional. |
7 | jesus2099 | - | Wants to introduce mix, cut and master entities, and define recordings as audio captured in a single studio take. Wants to indicate when a track uses an unknown version of a recording by relating the track to some sort of special recording. |
8 | nikki | Link | Would prefer to just define recordings as mixes and put mastering information on releases. If we really have to add new levels, would create a new master level and define recordings as mixes, but minimalising changes to the current system. |