History talk:Untitled Release Style Proposal: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(The most frequent case though is that the release is in fact eponym and the title shall be the artist name.) |
m (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal talk:Untitled Release Style to History talk:Untitled Release Style Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The most frequent case though is that the release is in fact eponym and the title shall then be the artist name. [[User:Jesus2099|Jesus2099]] 18:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC) |
The most frequent case though is that the release is in fact eponym and the title shall then be the artist name. [[User:Jesus2099|Jesus2099]] 18:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
: That's not part of the proposal, however, nor has it been part of the (proposed) guideline as used. [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 19:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:44, 28 August 2016
The most frequent case though is that the release is in fact eponym and the title shall then be the artist name. Jesus2099 18:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not part of the proposal, however, nor has it been part of the (proposed) guideline as used. BrianSchweitzer 19:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
