Request For Veto: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updating with some basic veto process detail) |
(Redirecting to Proposals) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Proposals]] |
|||
<dl><dt>RFV |
|||
<dd>The last stage in a proposal on the Style mailinglist (see [[Style Council|StyleCouncil]]) to change a [[MusicBrainz]] guideline, practice, or policy. Follows a [[Request For Comment|RequestForComment]]. </dl> |
|||
==Vetos== |
|||
Please try to not cast "preemptive vetos" during the RFC stage, such as "If this goes to RFV, I will veto." Instead, try to work with the proposer to find a compromise on which you both can agree. |
|||
RFVs should not be vetoed simply because you do not like a change. Before casting a veto, please attempt to describe your concerns about the proposal, preferably during the RFC phase. A veto is not valid without a good argument as to why a proposal should not be accepted. |
|||
[[Category:Style]] [[Category:Style Council]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:09, 6 March 2010
Redirect to:
