Search results

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:10, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:13, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:12, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal]]
    58 bytes (7 words) - 19:08, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:54, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:56, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:55, 27 August 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[History:Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    70 bytes (9 words) - 18:54, 27 August 2016
  • ''This page describes a proposal for an enhancement of the Data Quality attribute in MusicBrainz Server. ...e extended to allow for better grading of data quality, and to incentivise data addition and confirmation. Checking liner additions can be a very tedious a
    5 KB (794 words) - 13:25, 11 November 2010
  • '''''Note''': This is a proposal. Not all of this process has been adopted yet.'' ...tally 2 different types of branches: schema change branches and non-schema change branches. These branches have different workflows, both of which are docume
    3 KB (582 words) - 14:02, 7 March 2012
  • * The release details may change. * Especially track durations can't be confirmed and could change.
    8 KB (1,345 words) - 00:16, 29 September 2011
  • ...e implemented as [[Data Quality|DataQuality]] and discussed in [[Talk:Data Quality|DataQualityDiscussion]]. This page will be kept for historical purposes. Agreed upon and open issues in [[Talk:Quality And Quantity|QualityAndQuantityDiscussion]] and the [http://lists.musicbrai
    7 KB (1,081 words) - 16:56, 10 November 2011
  • {{proposal}} Raw numbers: [[Change Default Data Quality Proposal/Raw Numbers]]
    10 KB (1,709 words) - 19:08, 27 August 2016
  • {{proposal}} This page contains raw data for [[Change Default Data Quality Proposal]].
    5 KB (392 words) - 18:54, 27 August 2016
  • ...where all of the old discussion on the overall Release Type Restructuring Proposal was, before Status and Format were split out. (Some has been moved below) Why change the CD5"/CD3" to CD 5cm and CD 8cm? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD5 CD5/C
    12 KB (2,009 words) - 19:17, 22 March 2010
  • ...would like to use MBIDs internally to make communication between incoming data sets easier * Will consider sharing partial label feed/data
    13 KB (2,006 words) - 00:33, 1 May 2014
  • ...tyle="font-size:40px; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 100">Picard Plugins Proposal</span> <span style="font-size:25px; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 100">A proposal for the management of plugins for MusicBrainz Picard</span>
    13 KB (2,118 words) - 18:00, 24 May 2022
  • ### Events, Venues, Studios (geographical data) ### all kinds of other data and then some
    17 KB (2,972 words) - 11:26, 30 October 2011
  • ...w questions of "style," defined as pretty much anything to do with how the data about music is presented and stored in the database. Typical issues are the ## [[Other Meta Data|OtherMetaData]] ([[Extra Title Information Style|ExtraTitleInformation]], a
    13 KB (1,991 words) - 22:49, 1 February 2013
  • === Next New Proposal Number === Next new proposal number: 353
    67 KB (8,499 words) - 16:06, 29 August 2016
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)