Search results

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...ell. I think we can make things a lot easier when just sticking to ARs and introducing only a "Recorded at" AR. This AR can be applied on release or track level. ...semantically a "release level" information. As Prodoc said, the [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedRelationships]] provide with the infrastructure to allow all we nee
    3 KB (425 words) - 18:40, 27 August 2016
  • This mini-summit is aimed at introducing customers and other people who use MusicBrainz data to the MusicBrainz team | Better coordination with the BBC for new artists / BBC Introducing
    5 KB (686 words) - 17:47, 30 January 2012
  • ...r the artist's home country and a full set of Track-Track and Track-Artist relationships for every applicable track? On the other hand, I see definite value to the
    1 KB (183 words) - 20:34, 24 September 2012
  • ===BBC Introducing landing page=== *All of the data going through BBC Introducing has MusicBrainz IDs, which means that new artists do have to do MusicBrainz
    12 KB (1,966 words) - 05:53, 7 February 2012
  • Following recent discussion about implementing [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedRelationships]], here is an initial listing of proposed relationshi ...ncedRelationshipsInterface]] that will be implemented before proposing new relationships.'' --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]]
    17 KB (2,520 words) - 13:59, 4 October 2011
  • ::::::IMO this is best solved @ UI level instead of introducing another hack. Maybe exactly as with artist; show the English alias in a pop ...ip ''(still to be requested)'' and not inherit the composer and librettist relationships from it.
    19 KB (3,168 words) - 08:43, 10 September 2011