Search results

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • This proposal has now passed, see [[Advanced Relationship Style]], however, two lines depend on other changes, those have been left h ...neric Engineer type should be used, and '''not''' one of the more specific Engineer types.
    2 KB (341 words) - 20:33, 28 August 2016
  • ...>for an [[Artist|artist]]. This [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]] is used to describe any [[Artist|artist]] who is a ''non-performing'' par :* Live sound mixer (aka: FOH engineer, front of house engineer)
    2 KB (247 words) - 20:46, 26 May 2015
  • : This indicates the date the engineer first worked on engineering the recording. : This indicates the date the engineer last worked on engineering the recording.
    2 KB (213 words) - 19:08, 3 May 2014
  • | '''German''' || '''MusicBrainz relationship''' ...composed ([[rt:d59d99ea-23d4-4a80-b066-edca32ee158f|Composer Relationship Type]])
    4 KB (459 words) - 09:50, 30 March 2014
  • ...aned up], to form the current Engineer Relationship Class, and its various Relationship Types. I propose changing 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By' - this is the most common phrasing of this role, and is a
    7 KB (1,193 words) - 00:19, 11 March 2010
  • | style="background:lightblue" | To Recording, decided in [http://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz/2010/2010-08/2010- | style="background:plum" | To Recording-Work
    28 KB (3,945 words) - 18:33, 4 November 2011
  • ...performer, lyricist, band/choir/orchestra, bandmember, designer, producer, engineer, remixer, … } ** [[Artist/Type|Artist type]] — ?
    8 KB (1,159 words) - 18:29, 24 August 2012
  • The problem is that the [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]] does not reflect well what people mean when they say "mix" "remix". ...s, I didn't listen to that kind of music much yet nor did I own much remix type music ''at all''.men nok om det.
    10 KB (1,694 words) - 22:47, 10 November 2011
  • .... He is the person who compiles the audio streams recorded by the recoding engineer down to one stereo audio track. More precisely he mixes freshly recorded au Mix-DJs do, however, not have the original single audiostreams that the mix engineer dealt with. They only deal with the completely mix-engineered tracks.
    14 KB (2,417 words) - 22:48, 10 November 2011
  • ...the performing artist, either of whom should then also be given a co-audio engineer credit. ...s given a "guest conductor" credit on a particular release, release group, recording, or track.
    4 KB (500 words) - 22:14, 3 May 2014
  • For assistance in determining the correct relationship types to use when describing compiling, DJ mixing, mastering, mixing, remas Often a relationship could be added at multiple levels. For example, the liner notes on a releas
    7 KB (1,190 words) - 08:02, 3 June 2022
  • #* 'presents' is rather formal and 'records' doesn't really fit every format type: # NOW: Artist had an engineer position Label
    12 KB (1,834 words) - 17:56, 7 April 2010
  • ...e="background:red" | The NGS migration scripts either don't handle this AR type or do something different ! AR Type
    13 KB (1,520 words) - 18:33, 4 November 2011
  • ** [[Release Group/Type|Release Group type]] * [[Recording]]
    7 KB (1,114 words) - 12:10, 8 September 2023
  • ...ngle, continuous performance, usually in front of public; and the "studio" recording, which happens usually in specialized locations, with many different takes, ...sal uses "performed at" for songs played live and "recorded at" for studio-recording; it tries to use both ("recorded/performed"), for the general "put music to
    11 KB (1,869 words) - 18:40, 27 August 2016
  • ...nships]]. It explains quite well how AR works. The [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]s in this text are however outdated proposals. ...torm about missing relationships that we should keep track of in MB. These relationship types as well as the relationships themselves should be user moderatable.
    14 KB (2,227 words) - 17:02, 20 October 2011
  • | <h4 style='display: none'>RFC-204: Decommission Don't Make Relationship Clusters</h4> ...& Wikipage --> [[Don't_Make_Relationship_Clusters|Decommission Don't Make Relationship Clusters]]
    67 KB (8,499 words) - 16:06, 29 August 2016
  • ...statistics of how many of which type are defined. ([[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]] does have a list, shorter and more aggregated th | artist || label || 3 || had an engineer position at || 2
    21 KB (2,666 words) - 21:36, 30 October 2011
  • <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">''Update: Since this page is getting too long to edit, we are moving ...ionship. If you want to see the real mess, I propose you read [[Don't Make Relationship Clusters|DontMakeRelationshipClusters]] (and perhaps also [[Linking Differe
    22 KB (3,637 words) - 16:59, 28 August 2016
  • ...ted, searched for, referred to by MBID, and linked to each other through [[Relationship|relationships]] or foreign key constraints in some case. Each primary entity type has a main table sometimes accompanied by complementary tables of which a f
    21 KB (3,347 words) - 18:44, 21 July 2023
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)