History:Untitled Bootleg Style: Difference between revisions
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Bogus links (Imported from MoinMoin)) |
m (10 revision(s)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
</ul>Would anyone be oposed to hosting/linking to some sort of US state and Canadian providence abbreviation list here? --[[User:SenRepus|SenRepus]] |
</ul>Would anyone be oposed to hosting/linking to some sort of US state and Canadian providence abbreviation list here? --[[User:SenRepus|SenRepus]] |
||
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">nope. [[State Abbreviations|StateAbbreviations]] --[[User:BrianG|BrianG]] |
<ul><li style="list-style-type:none">nope. [[State Abbreviations|StateAbbreviations]] --[[User:BrianG|BrianG]] |
||
</ul>I have encountered a huge problem - I have found two radio sessions by the band 65daysofstatic, both without any indication as to the order of the tracks. More to the point, both would end up with the bootleg name 2005-xx-xx: London, UK. This is as much detail as I have about the two. What should I do in the case of this conflict? --[[eriatarka1]] |
|||
</ul> |
|||
</ul> |
</ul> |
||
Revision as of 08:39, 15 March 2009
Style for Untitled Bootlegs
A untitled bootleg of a live concert should be named with the date and location of the concert, as follows:
YYYY-MM-DD: Location
Where:
- YYYY = the full year,
- MM = the numerical month, zero padded,
- DD = the numerical day of the month, zero padded
- Location can be the venue name and/or the location, in least significant to most significant order.
If the release venue and date is not known, title the release [unknown].
- This is an OfficialStyleGuideline, see LiveBootlegStyle for a try of incorporating titled live bootlegs into this.
Example
2000-10-22: Las Vegas, NV, USA
2000-06-01: Dublin, Ireland (disc 2)
Milan, Italy (disc 1)
2004-02-27
Rationale
Discussion
- What about countries where more than one name is common? I prefer "USA" over "United States of America" or "US" because it's a lot shorter and still well known (and is also easier to search for than "US") and "UK" over "United Kingdom" for similar reasons. What about "The Netherlands"/"Netherlands"/"Holland"? "The Netherlands" seems to be the most common but there are quite a few with just "Netherlands". --Nikki About the UK bit. The country UK includes a few countries its self. Should we then use UK (or United Kingdom) instead of England, N. Ireland, Scotland and Wales? --Sambalbij
- Well, the releases list just uses United Kingdom. It'd be nice to be able to have a per-track recording info & I'd guess we'd end up using the same country list. From personal prefence (as an English Brit) I always use UK. --ZeroGravitas As a Scottish Brit, I prefer UK too. --RodBegbie About "The Netherlands"/"Netherlands"/"Holland": Holland is definitely wrong. It's a province, not the name of the country. I always use "The Netherlands", as it's plural (meaning 'the low lands'), and I think it's most commonly used.
- I disagree. The place name should always be present. --Sambalbij I agree with Sambalbij. Not everyone knows that Köln is a city. --SenRepus
- But even if you don't, it's easy to guess, and even easier to verify e.g. with a web search. Or try searching for "KölnArena, Germany"... In any case, I agree with Shepard. --derGraph
- nope. StateAbbreviations --BrianG