History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Revision as of 22:03, 27 August 2016 by CallerNo6 (talk | contribs) (CallerNo6 moved page Proposal talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) to History talk:Advanced Entity (Post-NGS) Proposal: https://chatlogs.metabrainz.org/brainzbot/metabrainz/msg/3675767/)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Series

Me love! Especially I love the series proposal if it would mean that we would dump the volume number style guideline (which is used for keeping releases in a series together even if their names don't really imply it). //bnw

"Group" vs "Band"

Re: Entities, related concepts: what's the difference between "Group" and "Band?" Also, I think it'd be nice to have Collaboration, too. I'd also like to see a UPC and ISBN AR link for releases. ojnkpjg

  • A "Group" is a more general term. A band is a group as is an orchestra, but an orchestra is not a band. Though these related concepts list was not meant to be exclusive, I just wanted to list some terms that are used yet and are related to the Artist entity and perhaps could lead to some discussion about more subtypes of this entity. I don't think we need an entity for UPC or ISBNs. In ReleaseDataSet I wrote another proposal that covers this. --Shepard
Retrieved from "https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/index.php?title=History_talk:Advanced_Entity_(Post-NGS)_Proposal&oldid=70751"