History talk:Proposals/History: Difference between revisions

From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 116: Line 116:
| <!-- Affects --> New guideline
| <!-- Affects --> New guideline
| <!-- Trac ticket --> [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/5635 5635]
| <!-- Trac ticket --> [http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/5635 5635]
| <!-- Status --> Passed
| <!-- Status --> Passed and implemented
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008749.html RFC]
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008749.html RFC]
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-05
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-05
Line 129: Line 129:
| <!-- Affects --> New guideline
| <!-- Affects --> New guideline
| <!-- Trac ticket --> None
| <!-- Trac ticket --> None
| <!-- Status --> Passed
| <!-- Status --> Passed and implemented
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008750.html RFC]
| <!-- RFC --> [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-March/008750.html RFC]
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-05
| <!-- RFC Date --> 2010-03-05

Revision as of 08:48, 15 March 2010

Comments

Note: Comments on particular proposals should be sent on the style list in the appropriate thread. They do not belong here.  :)

Old proposals that have migrated here until something better is done with them

Allow Instrument Attribute for Members of a Band

Should MemberOfBandRelationshipType not have an instrument attribute? --DonRedman

This would introduce some additional complexity in interpreting artist roles: see ArtistRoleInheritance --MatthewExon

Another thought: the instrument attribute doesn't have "vocals", so this wouldn't work for recording singers. Maybe the InstrumentRelationshipAttribute hierarchy should include the VocalRelationshipAttribute hierarchy, and "Performed instrument on" be merged with "Performed vocal on"? There are other roles for members of a band as well: The Prodigy has two dancers as "official" members. IMO these could probably be adequately covered by "other" --MatthewExon

Also Known As

The current Alias property should be repurposed now that AR is ready. Artist who have recorded under multiple names should have a relationship instead. The existing Alias property would still be usefully for misspelled names but there are some artists like Aphex Twin and Wynonna Judd who have recorded under different names and the release should be reflected correctly for those artists. The current "is the legal name/is the performing name" is insufficient since in some cases an artist might perform under two names and neither is their legal name (i.e. Wynonna and Wynonna Judd) --WolfSong

Rename Legal Name to Birth Name

I propose renaming this simply because more often than not, finding someone's birth name is more plausible than their legal name since names can be changed and although in the US such information becomes public record, this may not be the case everywhere. This was actually changed from official name to legal name due to discussions over Wendy/Walter Carlos. In this scenario Wendy is probably the legal name and Walter is the birth name. Both names should be listed separately since this person has released recordings under each name. --WolfSong

Former Proposals

Style Proposals

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-12: Classical Release Language

RFC-12

Classical Release Language ? ? ? Replaced by RFC-67 ? ? ? ?

RFC-13: Classical Release Title Style

RFC-13

Classical Release Title Style Andrew Conkling Release titles for classical N/A Replaced by RFC-67 Proposal N/A N/A N/A N/A

RFC-14: Classical Track Title Partnumber Style

RFC-14

Classical Track Title Partnumber Style ? Track titles for classical ? Replaced by RFC-67 Never sent N/A N/A N/A N/A

RFC-22: Live Bootleg Style

RFC-22

Live Bootleg Style BrianFreud Replacement for Untitled Bootleg Style 1053 Passed and implemented RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-01 2010-03-03

RFC-23: Live Track Style

RFC-23

Live Track Style BrianFreud Replacement for Untitled Bootleg Style 2141 Passed and implemented RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-01 2010-03-03

RFC-45: Release Event Style

RFC-45

Release Event Style ? Release events 2145 Adopted and resumed as RFC-64 ? ? ? ?

RFC-7: Capitalization Standard Spanish

RFC-7

Capitalization Standard Spanish Toni Panadès (t0n3t) and reosarevok New guideline 5635 Passed and implemented RFC 2010-03-05 RFV 2010-03-12 2010-03-14

RFC-101: Capitalization Standard Catalan

RFC-101

Capitalization Standard Catalan Toni Panadès (t0n3t) New guideline None Passed and implemented RFC 2010-03-05 RFV 2010-03-12 2010-03-14

Advanced Relationship Proposals

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-73: (invalid)

RFC-73

(invalid; duplicate entry for RFC-36 and RFC-4) ? AR modification N/A

RFC-94: Decommission Label Relationship Class

RFC-94

Decommission Label Relationship Class BrianFreud Removes 1 Relationship Class Passed and implemented RFC 2010-03-01 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10

Other Proposals

RFC # Title & Wikipage Champion Affects Trac ticket Status RFC RFC Date RFV RFV Date Passage Date

RFC-51: Set Track Times From Disc ID

RFC-51

Set Track Times From Disc ID ? ? ? Passed and Implemented ? ? ? ? ?

RFC-72: NGS: Alternate Genders

RFC-72

NGS: Alternate Genders BrianFreud NGS development MBS-344 Passed, jira updated RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-03 2010-03-05

RFC-71: NGS: Groups and Gender

RFC-71

NGS: Groups and Gender BrianFreud NGS development MBS-450 Passed; decision reported in jira RFC 2010-02-22 RFV 2010-03-08 2010-03-10