Talk:Cleanup Of The Month: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note: other ideas, such as for projects and classical etcetera go here; I think it will be easier to continue with CotM if "artists we can conceivably do in a month or so" is on the official list, while "special cases" are here. Once we actually get a good CotM machine and routine going, and have done it enough times to be familiar with the odds and ends, we can think about maybe doing a Big Project --~ [[User:CatCat|猫猫]]~<span style="color:#5C8CFA">♪</span>~[[User talk:CatCat|何?]] 09:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | Mozart: I'd be hesitant to suggest classical, but track titles are now all cleaned up, save for ~1650 tracks which are so badly identified ("Allegro", "The Magic Flute", etc) that I can't correct them without knowing what the releases are. It's the second largest non-SPA in the database, and close to 75% of all releases have no performer info ARs or release events. A good half of them were added on expiration (0:0). Likely more than a few dupes still hiding in there, as well. -- [[Brian Schweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 05:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | I'm starting to think that one month isn't long enough considering the amount of moderators helping out and the amount of time we can all spend on MB (or ''want'' to spend on the one artist). Maybe two months is better? We could probably keep the 'of the Month' extension though, if an artist ''is'' cleaned up sufficiently in one month we can move on. --[[User:Mdhowe|Mdhowe]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
==Nominations for Cleanup of the Month== |
|||
; [[Artist:f81d592c-993f-4693-b53a-57db5a6257b9|Blood, Sweat & Tears]] |
|||
: Well known artist, but with a messy and incomplete discography. |
|||
; [[Artist:70248960-cb53-4ea4-943a-edb18f7d336f|Bruce Springsteen]] |
|||
: Well known artist, the 3rd. Really bad style and lots of bootlegs. [[User:Shepard|Shepard]] |
|||
; [[Artist:06fb1c8b-566e-4cb2-985b-b467c90781d4|Jimi Hendrix]] |
|||
: mister Matt Perry on forum :D [[User:Mdhowe|Mdhowe]] |
|||
; [[Artist:9fdaa16b-a6c4-4831-b87c-bc9ca8ce7eaa|The Who]] |
|||
: I think it would be a good challenge; normal bootlegs and official bootlegs (if there is such a thing). |
|||
; [[Artist:1884ed9c-6fe1-468d-a7f8-8d19c9c4e441|Status Quo]] |
|||
; [[Artist:87c5dedd-371d-4a53-9f7f-80522fb7f3cb|Björk]] |
|||
: Well known artist, lots of bootlegs. [[User:Nine99|Nine99]] |
|||
; [[Artist:53b106e7-0cc6-42cc-ac95-ed8d30a3a98e|John Williams]] |
|||
: Similar to Morricone in the number of entries, and the types of issues. Also, there are at least 8 different John Williams in the database, so easy potential for incorrect artist attributions between them. |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 10: | ||
; [[Artist:d6bd72bc-b1e2-4525-92aa-0f853cbb41bf|Soundtrack]] |
; [[Artist:d6bd72bc-b1e2-4525-92aa-0f853cbb41bf|Soundtrack]] |
||
: "Month of the Special Purpose Artist" -- [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 03:43, 02 September 2007 (UTC) |
: "Month of the Special Purpose Artist" -- [[User:BrianSchweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 03:43, 02 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:: Ooh, I like this idea. --[[User:kuno|kuno]]. |
|||
; Non-Album Tracks |
; Non-Album Tracks |
||
| Line 43: | Line 16: | ||
; Add release dates (years) to everything! --[[User:kuno|kuno]]. |
; Add release dates (years) to everything! --[[User:kuno|kuno]]. |
||
: We'd probably need a centralised report to wok on. |
|||
== Discussion == |
|||
=== Classical === |
|||
| ⚫ | Mozart: I'd be hesitant to suggest classical, but track titles are now all cleaned up, save for ~1650 tracks which are so badly identified ("Allegro", "The Magic Flute", etc.) that I can't correct them without knowing what the releases are. It's the second largest non-SPA in the database, and close to 75% of all releases have no performer info ARs or release events. A good half of them were added on expiration (0:0). Likely more than a few dupes still hiding in there, as well. -- [[Brian Schweitzer|BrianSchweitzer]] 05:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | I'm starting to think that one month isn't long enough considering the amount of moderators helping out and the amount of time we can all spend on MB (or ''want'' to spend on the one artist). Maybe two months is better? We could probably keep the 'of the Month' extension though, if an artist ''is'' cleaned up sufficiently in one month we can move on. --[[User:Mdhowe|Mdhowe]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 09:10, 20 February 2011
Note: other ideas, such as for projects and classical etcetera go here; I think it will be easier to continue with CotM if "artists we can conceivably do in a month or so" is on the official list, while "special cases" are here. Once we actually get a good CotM machine and routine going, and have done it enough times to be familiar with the odds and ends, we can think about maybe doing a Big Project --~ 猫猫~♪~何? 09:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Other Nomination Ideas
- Soundtrack
- "Month of the Special Purpose Artist" -- BrianSchweitzer 03:43, 02 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ooh, I like this idea. --kuno.
- Non-Album Tracks
- Sen suggested in IRC that we have a CotM specifically for NATs, to clean the accumulated ones that are junk, or have since been released on official releases. -- BrianSchweitzer 03:43, 02 September 2007 (UTC)
- Add release dates (years) to everything! --kuno.
- We'd probably need a centralised report to wok on.
Discussion
Classical
Mozart: I'd be hesitant to suggest classical, but track titles are now all cleaned up, save for ~1650 tracks which are so badly identified ("Allegro", "The Magic Flute", etc.) that I can't correct them without knowing what the releases are. It's the second largest non-SPA in the database, and close to 75% of all releases have no performer info ARs or release events. A good half of them were added on expiration (0:0). Likely more than a few dupes still hiding in there, as well. -- BrianSchweitzer 05:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Time-frame
I'm starting to think that one month isn't long enough considering the amount of moderators helping out and the amount of time we can all spend on MB (or want to spend on the one artist). Maybe two months is better? We could probably keep the 'of the Month' extension though, if an artist is cleaned up sufficiently in one month we can move on. --Mdhowe
- I wouldn't mind it being "open" for more than one month. -- FrederikSOlesen 05:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
