Search results
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Page title matches
- ...hers wouldn't. On the other hand, you might want to not even consider it a performance of a work, assuming that it's just basically all "background noise"...--[[U920 bytes (150 words) - 13:05, 30 October 2011
- ...[[Recording:c016b14b-6de0-48a1-a1d9-20fa172ef71a|A Day in the Life]] is a performance of [[Work:fd1aa4f2-ba26-3a05-b72d-4392c35a073c|A Day in the Life]] * [[Recording]] is a performance of [[Work]]4 KB (749 words) - 20:05, 3 May 2014
- ...one performance and because performance is a slightly dubious term for the relationship in some cases. The same can be said for medleys. I think this can be droppe I'm not sure there is the perfect link phrase because the relationship will be used in circumstances where (a) 1 recording includes versions of ma2 KB (345 words) - 13:33, 7 September 2013
Page text matches
- * [[Talk:Amazon Relationship Type]] * [[Talk:Arranger Relationship Type]]2 KB (177 words) - 14:45, 20 March 2010
- * [[Advanced Relationship|Advanced Relationship]] * [[:Category:Relationship Type|Relationship Type]]4 KB (403 words) - 23:16, 30 March 2010
- ...band on a track (or release/RG) without being a bandleader; combining that performance concept into the artist-artist relational concept of this proposal only con727 bytes (104 words) - 22:16, 3 May 2014
- This indicates an [[Artist|artist]] who conducted a performance. ...ster Position Relationship Type Proposal|Choirmaster Position Relationship Type]] should be used to describe the fact that an [[Artist|artist]] was the ''c3 KB (362 words) - 22:14, 3 May 2014
- <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">An attribute to indicate a stepchild would fall into this category as Another way could be to use [[Performance Name|PerformanceName]] but [[Same Artist With Different Names]] says "Note that3 KB (409 words) - 11:48, 20 March 2010
- This proposal is part of [[Performance Restructuring Proposal|PerformanceRestructuringProposal]].'' ...ng, recitative and the like, that is which is not intended to be a musical performance of its own. Another definition could be that no lyrics are performed.2 KB (297 words) - 06:21, 28 August 2016
- ...but did not form a lasting group. For groups you should use the membership type. *'''[[Date Relationship Attribute|start date]]'''[[image:Attention.png|''This is a '''required''' a5 KB (752 words) - 20:44, 26 May 2015
- ...ut was dropped from the final NGS schema, as it was considered to make the relationship between work, recording, and track too complex for the user (who would alre This page describes the recording (AKA performance) object and its role in the [[Object Model|ObjectModel]].3 KB (399 words) - 20:45, 25 October 2011
- =The Relationship Cluster Problem= ...For these nine siblings that requires 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 36 relationship entries. This is a lot of <s>unnecessary</s> moderation work.6 KB (970 words) - 22:02, 29 March 2010
- ...ndicates that a recording is made up of multiple parts (e.g. an orchestral performance broken into multiple parts or tracks on a release) ...e movements have been split in multiple tracks. [[Performance Relationship Type]].1 KB (173 words) - 20:03, 3 May 2014
- This proposal is part of [[Performance Restructuring Proposal|PerformanceRestructuringProposal]].'' ...udiobooks, which are read by a reader. For those use [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]].2 KB (291 words) - 21:01, 27 August 2016
- This proposal is part of [[Performance Restructuring Proposal|PerformanceRestructuringProposal]].'' ...are normally spoken by others. For a narrator use [[Narrator Relationship Type]].2 KB (299 words) - 13:59, 28 August 2016
- ...al Relationship Attribute|VocalRelationshipAttribute]] or the [[Instrument Relationship Attribute|InstrumentRelationshipAttribute]] or any that is proposed here. ...onship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]] as subtypes to [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].5 KB (709 words) - 19:18, 27 August 2016
- ...uct where a band has the name of the main performer - or the [[Performance Name]] of the main performing artist. ...[[rt:88562a60-2550-48f0-8e8e-f54d95c7369a|Supporting Musician Relationship Type]].2 KB (438 words) - 21:28, 22 October 2013
- | '''German''' || '''MusicBrainz relationship''' ...composed ([[rt:d59d99ea-23d4-4a80-b066-edca32ee158f|Composer Relationship Type]])4 KB (459 words) - 09:50, 30 March 2014
- ...roposal|PerformanceRestructuringProposal]] for ideas on how to restructure performance link types and attributes.<br/> ...ss|Composition Relationship Class]] generally; see [[Composer Relationship Type]] discussion. -- [[User:JimDeLaHunt|JimDeLaHunt]] 2007-12-173 KB (496 words) - 10:35, 24 September 2018
- :This indicates a group of people that may or may not have a distinctive name. :This type should be used if none of the above types "Person", "Group", or "Character"2 KB (414 words) - 04:21, 6 June 2015
- ...the sampled material, using the [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]]. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]] ...riting of drum lines etc would be a case for [[Instrumentator Relationship Type|InstrumentatorRelationshipType]] --[[User:Gecks|Gecks]]7 KB (1,193 words) - 22:01, 22 March 2010
- : This indicates that an [[Artist|artist]] did not play a main role in the performance. : This special version of this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]] indicates that an [[Artist|artist]] sang or spoke on the release or track3 KB (481 words) - 21:04, 3 May 2014
- ...[[Recording:c016b14b-6de0-48a1-a1d9-20fa172ef71a|A Day in the Life]] is a performance of [[Work:fd1aa4f2-ba26-3a05-b72d-4392c35a073c|A Day in the Life]] * [[Recording]] is a performance of [[Work]]4 KB (749 words) - 20:05, 3 May 2014
