Search results

Page title matches

• Category talk:Engineer Relationship Class
  ...aned up], to form the current Engineer Relationship Class, and its various Relationship Types.
  7 KB (1,193 words) - 00:19, 11 March 2010
• Talk:Production Relationship Class
  ...ationshipType]] allows the place that a work was recorded to be added as a relationship. ...'t think why anyone would ever be bothered to add this information. These relationship types seem only to obscure the genuinely important ones, like "produced" an
  2 KB (298 words) - 03:12, 15 March 2010
• Talk:Discography Relationship Class
  ...me for the above types of URL. Maybe this should just be called the "URL" class? : [[Review Relationship Type|ReviewRelationshipType]] would probably want to allow both Album -- UR
  1 KB (246 words) - 00:53, 5 April 2009
• Talk:Get Music Relationship Class
  622 bytes (105 words) - 09:47, 7 April 2009
• Talk:Composition Relationship Class
  IMHO two more relationship are needed and are proper here, please check if correct and AR syntax * [[Attribute To Relationship Type|AttributeToRelationshipType]]:
  5 KB (796 words) - 18:46, 15 March 2009
• Category talk:Production Relationship Class
  So basically, I can't see why the first two are lumped together into one relationship while the third is out on its own. I also can't see why those ones are spe
  3 KB (551 words) - 07:09, 15 March 2010
• Talk:Other Databases Relationship Class
  ...ons as possible More discussion about this on the page for the [[Wikipedia Relationship Type|WikipediaRelationshipType]]. --[[User:Shepard|Shepard]] ...:none">And: Discogs is not an open database. Should we restructure the URL relationship classes for links to non-open/commercial musical data? Where would an last.
  699 bytes (110 words) - 03:32, 16 March 2009
• Talk:Personal Association Relationship Class
  ...sician is married from looking at the database: if there's no "married to" relationship, it might be because they're not married, or it might be because they're ma ''This is the original type definition source for this class:''
  3 KB (463 words) - 19:12, 15 March 2009
• Talk:Musical Association Relationship Class
  640 bytes (90 words) - 08:11, 31 March 2009
• Talk:Alternative Version Relationship Class
  302 bytes (49 words) - 19:18, 15 March 2009

Page text matches

• User:Reosarevok/Featured artists for recordings
  ...p Class|Relationship Class]] (usually [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance]]) to link to the artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz. ...ationship Class]], [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]].
  2 KB (290 words) - 15:02, 7 June 2011
• User:BrianSchweitzer/CleanUpARDocs
  * [[Advanced Relationship|Advanced Relationship]] * [[:Category:Relationship Type|Relationship Type]]
  4 KB (403 words) - 23:16, 30 March 2010
• User:JesseW/sandbox
  {{#if:{{{1|}}}|* {{:Category:{{{1}}} Relationship Class}} |}}{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{Newline}}* {{:Category:{{{2}}} Relationship Class}}
  493 bytes (34 words) - 17:52, 5 October 2013
• User talk:BrianSchweitzer/Bandleader Position Relationship Type Proposal
  ...(akin to the Composer Relationship Type vs the proposed Composer Position Relationship Type). One can lead a band on a track (or release/RG) without being a band
  727 bytes (104 words) - 22:16, 3 May 2014
• Talk:Mash-up Relationship Type
  This relationship doesn't allow [release-track] or [track-release] [[Entity Pair|EntityPairs] ...to create a new relationship type for "masher-upper", or use the [[Remixer Relationship Type]].
  2 KB (253 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
• Talk:Compilation Relationship Type
  Could someone explain to me the difference between this and [[Same Track Relationship Type|SameTrackRelationshipType]]? Should both be used for the same track? ...an earlier version of the other, I don't see the point in having a special relationship depending on the context of the newer version. //[[User:bnw|bnw]] This is a
  2 KB (390 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
• History:Featuring Artist Style
  ...e by another artist, but not equally as they would be in a [[Collaboration Relationship Type|collaboration]]. That is, they are given credit on the cover or track ...of the [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance Relationship Class]] to link to the featured artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz.
  3 KB (487 words) - 11:51, 26 May 2015
• Talk:Production Relationship Class
  ...ationshipType]] allows the place that a work was recorded to be added as a relationship. ...'t think why anyone would ever be bothered to add this information. These relationship types seem only to obscure the genuinely important ones, like "produced" an
  2 KB (298 words) - 03:12, 15 March 2010
• Credit Translations/Italian
  ...bed in [[:Category:Composition Relationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]]. ...composed by ''artist'' ([[rt:d59d99ea-23d4-4a80-b066-edca32ee158f|Composer Relationship Type]])
  2 KB (241 words) - 18:40, 22 November 2013
• Talk:Biography Relationship Type
  ...be encouraged to note this information in [[MusicBrainz]], possibly with a relationship attribute? * The AR Class specifies that open-content isn't required; any suggestion for a change in
  1 KB (152 words) - 14:50, 20 March 2010
• Google Code-in/Commonly used abbreviations
  {| class="wikitable sortable" |Relationship Editor
  1 KB (198 words) - 06:43, 26 November 2017
• Talk:Composer Relationship Type
  ...aterial, using the [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]]. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]] ...-type:none">Writing of drum lines etc would be a case for [[Instrumentator Relationship Type|InstrumentatorRelationshipType]] --[[User:Gecks|Gecks]]
  7 KB (1,193 words) - 22:01, 22 March 2010
• Talk:Style/Titles/Extra title information
  ...of the [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance Relationship Class]] to link to the featured artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz.
  2 KB (284 words) - 18:40, 29 March 2012
• History talk:Performance Restructuring Proposal
  ...ationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]] generally; see [[Composer Relationship Type]] discussion. -- [[User:JimDeLaHunt|JimDeLaHunt]] 2007-12-17 ...ationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]] generally; see [[Composer Relationship Type|ComposerRelationshipType]] discussion. -- [[User:JimDeLaHunt|JimDeLaHu
  3 KB (496 words) - 10:35, 24 September 2018
• User:Tularion/Featured artists clarification
  ...p Class|Relationship Class]] (usually [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance]]) to link to the featured artist(s’) entries in MusicBrainz. ...ationship Class]], [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]]. Note that composers, remixers, compilers and songwriters can also be the
  4 KB (698 words) - 17:49, 6 December 2013
• Candidate for Deletion/Current
  * [[Advanced Relationship Family]] * [[Advanced Relationship Type Proposal]]
  15 KB (1,776 words) - 17:24, 3 October 2011
• User:Mihhkel/MusicBrainzi terminoloogia
  * [[Advanced Relationship|(Advanced) Relationship]] — seos ...nd in [[:Category:Compilation Relationship Class|Compilation Relationship Class]].
  8 KB (1,159 words) - 18:29, 24 August 2012
• MusicBrainz Wiki talk:Categories
  == Invalid Relationship Family Categories == ...ant ('Artist Label Relationship Family' would 100% duplicate 'Label Artist Relationship Family').
  8 KB (1,017 words) - 16:03, 26 May 2015
• History:Narrator Relationship Type Proposal
  ...ferent from audiobooks, which are read by a reader. For those use [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]]. ...ip Class|PerformanceRelationshipClass]]. It is a special case of [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].
  2 KB (291 words) - 21:01, 27 August 2016
• Talk:Additional Relationship Attribute
  ...nship ([[:Category:Composition Relationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]]). ...l, or not significant, don't use this attribute. Instead, use the [[Minor Relationship Attribute|MinorRelationshipAttribute]]. For the two examples above, Brian
  4 KB (728 words) - 10:24, 24 March 2010