User contributions for Nikki
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
17 March 2009
- 03:2503:25, 17 March 2009 diff hist −90 m gTIN No edit summary
- 03:2403:24, 17 March 2009 diff hist −180 m Editing FAQ No edit summary
- 03:1803:18, 17 March 2009 diff hist −30 m Releases With Pregap Tracks No edit summary
- 02:5102:51, 17 March 2009 diff hist +7 m User:Nikki No edit summary
- 02:4502:45, 17 March 2009 diff hist +13 m User:Nikki No edit summary
- 02:4402:44, 17 March 2009 diff hist +22 m User:Nikki No edit summary
16 March 2009
- 09:1109:11, 16 March 2009 diff hist −73 m Move Release Edit No edit summary
- 09:1009:10, 16 March 2009 diff hist −22 m Edit Release Name Edit No edit summary
- 09:1009:10, 16 March 2009 diff hist −70 m Edit Release Attributes Edit No edit summary
- 09:1009:10, 16 March 2009 diff hist −44 m Edit Release Language Edit No edit summary
- 09:1009:10, 16 March 2009 diff hist −37 m Edit Release Name Edit No edit summary
- 05:5805:58, 16 March 2009 diff hist −50 m Korean Artists No edit summary
- 05:5705:57, 16 March 2009 diff hist −82 m History:Change Track Artist Edit No edit summary
- 05:5605:56, 16 March 2009 diff hist −64 m Edit Track Name Edit No edit summary
- 05:5505:55, 16 March 2009 diff hist −104 m don't Swap Names Between Tracks No edit summary
- 05:5205:52, 16 March 2009 diff hist 0 N File:remove-off.gif No edit summary
- 05:4605:46, 16 March 2009 diff hist +54 N Talk:Release Type Restructuring Talk:Release Type Restructuring moved to Talk:Release Type Restructuring Proposal
- 05:4605:46, 16 March 2009 diff hist 0 m History talk:Release Type Restructuring Proposal Talk:Release Type Restructuring moved to Talk:Release Type Restructuring Proposal
- 05:3705:37, 16 March 2009 diff hist −16 m History:Edit Rating No edit summary
- 05:3105:31, 16 March 2009 diff hist +721 Nm History talk:Edit Rating New page: +1 -- mikemorr 17:01, 02 May 2008 (UTC) I like the idea, but I am not sure all the actual items used to raise the rank are correct. Some of them might prove unfeasible ...
- 05:3105:31, 16 March 2009 diff hist −780 m History:Edit Rating No edit summary
- 05:2705:27, 16 March 2009 diff hist −119 m Template:Status No edit summary
- 05:2605:26, 16 March 2009 diff hist +55 m History:Disc Number Style No edit summary
- 05:2605:26, 16 March 2009 diff hist −90 m User:Nikki No edit summary
- 05:2605:26, 16 March 2009 diff hist −917 m User:Nikki No edit summary
- 05:2205:22, 16 March 2009 diff hist +8 m Template:Status No edit summary
- 05:0805:08, 16 March 2009 diff hist +8 m Template:Status another test
- 04:3004:30, 16 March 2009 diff hist −55 m History:Disc Number Style testing
- 04:2904:29, 16 March 2009 diff hist +103 m Template:Status testing
- 04:2504:25, 16 March 2009 diff hist +781 Nm Talk:Free Download Relationship Type New page: Free is not free :-) What about where downloads are tied to conditions, like registering an email address or something? Does that qualify as free enough? Does it have to be a link to a...
- 04:2204:22, 16 March 2009 diff hist +1,634 Nm Talk:French Artists New page: I've attempted to create a valid translation, I'm not that good in French though. But since I've got examination of French tomorrow, it seemed like a good excercise ;) --[[User:azertus|aze... current
- 04:2204:22, 16 March 2009 diff hist −1,653 m French Artists No edit summary
- 04:1804:18, 16 March 2009 diff hist +2,555 Nm Talk:MusicBrainz Tag New page: It would be nifty if the OriginalVersion could be marked non-canonical/redirect to the latest version. --MartinRudat Would it be better to list ...
- 04:1804:18, 16 March 2009 diff hist −2,666 m MusicBrainz Tag No edit summary
- 04:1604:16, 16 March 2009 diff hist +2,290 Nm Talk:Style Issue New page: <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">(Shepard, after a comment from DonRedman): Is this not used anymore? I always put a lot of work in keeping it up to date, was this t... current
- 04:1504:15, 16 March 2009 diff hist −2,386 m Style Issue No edit summary
- 04:1204:12, 16 March 2009 diff hist +4,649 Nm History talk:Online Translator New page: <ul><li style="list-style-type:none">''The third-level bullet items get kind of long, wouldn't it be better to have something like the following instead?'' @alex * [http:/...
- 04:1204:12, 16 March 2009 diff hist −4,965 m History:Online Translator No edit summary
- 04:1004:10, 16 March 2009 diff hist −258 m Instrument Relationship Attribute No edit summary
- 03:4703:47, 16 March 2009 diff hist +513 m History talk:Release Language No edit summary
- 03:4603:46, 16 March 2009 diff hist −770 m History:Release Language No edit summary
- 03:4503:45, 16 March 2009 diff hist −113 m History talk:Featuring Artist Style No edit summary
- 03:4403:44, 16 March 2009 diff hist +1,549 Nm Talk:Instrumental Style New page: Also relevant to this discussion is [http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=4643690 edit 4643690] where wolfsong tried to add (instrumental) to Metallica's song "Orion". To summarize: B... current
- 03:4403:44, 16 March 2009 diff hist −1,568 m Instrumental Style No edit summary
- 03:4303:43, 16 March 2009 diff hist +613 Nm Talk:Style/Language/Turkish New page: Some of the cheaply produced CDs on the markets have pretty "interesting" liner notes. Quite a few of those people don't seem to bother with correct use their own language, they misspell e...
- 03:4303:43, 16 March 2009 diff hist −636 m Style/Language/Turkish No edit summary
- 03:4203:42, 16 March 2009 diff hist +513 Nm Talk:Compiler Relationship Type New page: The same question as for CompilationRelationshipType, do we need artist-track version of this type? --LukasLalinsky <ul><li style=... current
- 03:4203:42, 16 March 2009 diff hist −116 m History:Featuring Artist Style No edit summary
- 03:4103:41, 16 March 2009 diff hist +43 N Subjective Vs Objective Data Subjective Vs Objective Data moved to Subjective vs. Objective Data
- 03:4103:41, 16 March 2009 diff hist 0 m History:Subjective vs. Objective Data Subjective Vs Objective Data moved to Subjective vs. Objective Data