Search results
From MusicBrainz Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Page title matches
- ...aned up], to form the current Engineer Relationship Class, and its various Relationship Types.7 KB (1,193 words) - 00:19, 11 March 2010
- ...ationshipType]] allows the place that a work was recorded to be added as a relationship. ...'t think why anyone would ever be bothered to add this information. These relationship types seem only to obscure the genuinely important ones, like "produced" an2 KB (298 words) - 03:12, 15 March 2010
- ...me for the above types of URL. Maybe this should just be called the "URL" class? : [[Review Relationship Type|ReviewRelationshipType]] would probably want to allow both Album -- UR1 KB (246 words) - 00:53, 5 April 2009
- 622 bytes (105 words) - 09:47, 7 April 2009
- IMHO two more relationship are needed and are proper here, please check if correct and AR syntax * [[Attribute To Relationship Type|AttributeToRelationshipType]]:5 KB (796 words) - 18:46, 15 March 2009
- So basically, I can't see why the first two are lumped together into one relationship while the third is out on its own. I also can't see why those ones are spe3 KB (551 words) - 07:09, 15 March 2010
- ...ons as possible More discussion about this on the page for the [[Wikipedia Relationship Type|WikipediaRelationshipType]]. --[[User:Shepard|Shepard]] ...:none">And: Discogs is not an open database. Should we restructure the URL relationship classes for links to non-open/commercial musical data? Where would an last.699 bytes (110 words) - 03:32, 16 March 2009
- ...sician is married from looking at the database: if there's no "married to" relationship, it might be because they're not married, or it might be because they're ma ''This is the original type definition source for this class:''3 KB (463 words) - 19:12, 15 March 2009
- 640 bytes (90 words) - 08:11, 31 March 2009
- 302 bytes (49 words) - 19:18, 15 March 2009
Page text matches
- ...p Class|Relationship Class]] (usually [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance]]) to link to the artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz. ...ationship Class]], [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]].2 KB (290 words) - 15:02, 7 June 2011
- * [[Advanced Relationship|Advanced Relationship]] * [[:Category:Relationship Type|Relationship Type]]4 KB (403 words) - 23:16, 30 March 2010
- {{#if:{{{1|}}}|* {{:Category:{{{1}}} Relationship Class}} |}}{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{Newline}}* {{:Category:{{{2}}} Relationship Class}}493 bytes (34 words) - 17:52, 5 October 2013
- ...(akin to the Composer Relationship Type vs the proposed Composer Position Relationship Type). One can lead a band on a track (or release/RG) without being a band727 bytes (104 words) - 22:16, 3 May 2014
- This relationship doesn't allow [release-track] or [track-release] [[Entity Pair|EntityPairs] ...to create a new relationship type for "masher-upper", or use the [[Remixer Relationship Type]].2 KB (253 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
- Could someone explain to me the difference between this and [[Same Track Relationship Type|SameTrackRelationshipType]]? Should both be used for the same track? ...an earlier version of the other, I don't see the point in having a special relationship depending on the context of the newer version. //[[User:bnw|bnw]] This is a2 KB (390 words) - 21:51, 22 March 2010
- ...e by another artist, but not equally as they would be in a [[Collaboration Relationship Type|collaboration]]. That is, they are given credit on the cover or track ...of the [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance Relationship Class]] to link to the featured artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz.3 KB (487 words) - 11:51, 26 May 2015
- ...ationshipType]] allows the place that a work was recorded to be added as a relationship. ...'t think why anyone would ever be bothered to add this information. These relationship types seem only to obscure the genuinely important ones, like "produced" an2 KB (298 words) - 03:12, 15 March 2010
- ...bed in [[:Category:Composition Relationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]]. ...composed by ''artist'' ([[rt:d59d99ea-23d4-4a80-b066-edca32ee158f|Composer Relationship Type]])2 KB (241 words) - 18:40, 22 November 2013
- ...be encouraged to note this information in [[MusicBrainz]], possibly with a relationship attribute? * The AR Class specifies that open-content isn't required; any suggestion for a change in1 KB (152 words) - 14:50, 20 March 2010
- {| class="wikitable sortable" |Relationship Editor1 KB (198 words) - 06:43, 26 November 2017
- ...aterial, using the [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]]. --[[User:DonRedman|DonRedman]] ...-type:none">Writing of drum lines etc would be a case for [[Instrumentator Relationship Type|InstrumentatorRelationshipType]] --[[User:Gecks|Gecks]]7 KB (1,193 words) - 22:01, 22 March 2010
- ...of the [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance Relationship Class]] to link to the featured artist(s') entries in MusicBrainz.2 KB (284 words) - 18:40, 29 March 2012
- ...ationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]] generally; see [[Composer Relationship Type]] discussion. -- [[User:JimDeLaHunt|JimDeLaHunt]] 2007-12-17 ...ationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]] generally; see [[Composer Relationship Type|ComposerRelationshipType]] discussion. -- [[User:JimDeLaHunt|JimDeLaHu3 KB (496 words) - 10:35, 24 September 2018
- ...p Class|Relationship Class]] (usually [[:Category:Performance Relationship Class|Performance]]) to link to the featured artist(s’) entries in MusicBrainz. ...ationship Class]], [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]]. Note that composers, remixers, compilers and songwriters can also be the4 KB (698 words) - 17:49, 6 December 2013
- * [[Advanced Relationship Family]] * [[Advanced Relationship Type Proposal]]15 KB (1,776 words) - 17:24, 3 October 2011
- * [[Advanced Relationship|(Advanced) Relationship]] — seos ...nd in [[:Category:Compilation Relationship Class|Compilation Relationship Class]].8 KB (1,159 words) - 18:29, 24 August 2012
- == Invalid Relationship Family Categories == ...ant ('Artist Label Relationship Family' would 100% duplicate 'Label Artist Relationship Family').8 KB (1,017 words) - 16:03, 26 May 2015
- ...ferent from audiobooks, which are read by a reader. For those use [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]]. ...ip Class|PerformanceRelationshipClass]]. It is a special case of [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].2 KB (291 words) - 21:01, 27 August 2016
- ...nship ([[:Category:Composition Relationship Class|Composition Relationship Class]]). ...l, or not significant, don't use this attribute. Instead, use the [[Minor Relationship Attribute|MinorRelationshipAttribute]]. For the two examples above, Brian4 KB (728 words) - 10:24, 24 March 2010
- ...al Relationship Attribute|VocalRelationshipAttribute]] or the [[Instrument Relationship Attribute|InstrumentRelationshipAttribute]] or any that is proposed here. ...Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]] as subtypes to [[Speaker Relationship Type|SpeakerRelationshipType]].5 KB (709 words) - 19:18, 27 August 2016
- ...d has [[Narrator Relationship Type|NarratorRelationshipType]] and [[Reader Relationship Type|ReaderRelationshipType]] as subtypes. Use those last two subtypes inst ==Relationship Attributes==2 KB (297 words) - 06:21, 28 August 2016
- ...arration they are normally spoken by others. For a narrator use [[Narrator Relationship Type]]. ...the [[Performance Relationship Class]]. It is a special case of [[Speaker Relationship Type]].2 KB (299 words) - 13:59, 28 August 2016
- ...opose adding "'''Begin date''', '''End date''': Dates do not apply to this relationship. Leave them empty." But it occurs to me that it might be valid to record w I would really encourage you to change class. Fact is that class is a misnomer in the first place and should better be renamed to something2 KB (402 words) - 16:18, 7 October 2011
- * [[Musical Association Relationship Class]]750 bytes (84 words) - 07:42, 25 March 2024
- ...me for the above types of URL. Maybe this should just be called the "URL" class? : [[Review Relationship Type|ReviewRelationshipType]] would probably want to allow both Album -- UR1 KB (246 words) - 00:53, 5 April 2009
- {| border="1" class="wikitable sortable" | relationtype || the type of a relationship the URL is in (e.g. "wikidata")822 bytes (129 words) - 17:57, 27 January 2021
- ...sician is married from looking at the database: if there's no "married to" relationship, it might be because they're not married, or it might be because they're ma ''This is the original type definition source for this class:''3 KB (463 words) - 19:12, 15 March 2009
- ...junkies Music Junkies] at Trailer Music News) - it can be linked with this relationship. * To be a good target for this [[:Category:Relationship Type|relationship type]], the news coverage being linked should be sufficiently comprehensive3 KB (401 words) - 16:51, 28 August 2016
- ...ng should be done for quite a few of the pages in [[:Category:Relationship Class]], [[:Category:Edit Types]], and wait for it, [[:Category:Identifier]]. Put5 KB (735 words) - 23:15, 27 September 2011
- | ?: Add Advanced Relationship Qualifiers || 2006-07-25 || [[Advanced Relationships Free Text Qualifiers|w | ?: Add Class "Artist Type" || 2006-07-04 || [[Artist Type Project|wiki]] || - || ? |8 KB (878 words) - 23:48, 8 September 2012
- ...with [[Object Model/Property|Properties]] and [[Object Model/Relationship|/Relationship]]s. ''This document is not about a database schema.'' Its purpose is to und ...t object ''classes'', but it is tedious to always say "an object of the xy class".10 KB (1,489 words) - 20:08, 25 October 2011
- {| class="wikitable" ...sal]]|{{#if:{{{ar|}}}|[[Proposals#Advanced_Relationship_Proposals|advanced relationship proposal]]|[[Proposals#Other_Proposals|proposal]]}}}} and is '''not officia2 KB (308 words) - 03:55, 6 June 2015
- =Track/Release Advanced Relationship Types= | '''Advanced Relationship''' || '''Release''' || '''Track''' || '''Type''' || '''Note'''13 KB (1,816 words) - 14:55, 4 May 2014
- ...position Relationship Class|composition]] and/or [[Production Relationship Class|production]] credits under romanized names, so it may take some digging to * Often times in the case of production-class credits, a company name will appear next to the artist's name. If you track4 KB (659 words) - 19:18, 20 August 2013
- ...case, it makes more sense to consider this a remix, and use the [[Remixer Relationship Type|RemixerRelationshipType]]. ([http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/mu ...hip Attribute|AdvancedRelationshipAttribute]] that should be added to this relationship?17 KB (2,750 words) - 04:37, 2 April 2009
- {{Status|This whitelist is for a relationship type which is '''deprecated''' and no longer applies. Please see [[How to A ...:Relationship/Whitelist|whitelistSource=Has Cover Art At Relationship Type|class = External Resource Art}}8 KB (1,171 words) - 13:06, 27 March 2013
- '''''This guideline is part of [[Advanced Relationship Style]].''''' ...em; background: none; width: {{{width|{{{1|auto}}}}}};" {{#if:{{{limit|}}}|class="toclimit-{{{limit}}}"}}6 KB (942 words) - 16:06, 26 May 2015
- ...aned up], to form the current Engineer Relationship Class, and its various Relationship Types.7 KB (1,193 words) - 00:19, 11 March 2010
- ...this way: which is discussed further on [[Musical Association Relationship Class|MusicalAssociationRelationshipClass]], [http://lists.musicbrainz.org/piperm2 KB (227 words) - 08:25, 26 November 2013
- ''Note: A "founder" attribute has since been added to the [[Member Of Band Relationship Type]] to allow this data to be stored.'' ...w membership dates are specified in the [[Musical Association Relationship Class|MusicalAssociationRelationshipClass]] in [[Advanced Relationships|AdvancedR11 KB (1,789 words) - 22:15, 10 October 2011
- ...roblem is that the [[:Category:Remix Relationship Class|Remix Relationship Class]] does not reflect well what people mean when they say "mix" "remix". The f ...new very little about it) can see the need for a separated "mixed by" type relationship, I think we can say that it's needed.10 KB (1,694 words) - 22:47, 10 November 2011
- {| class="wikitable" border="1" ! [[Composer Relationship Type|Composer]]14 KB (1,887 words) - 21:33, 2 April 2013
- ...r''': If your proposal changes or adds an [[Advanced_Relationship|Advanced Relationship]], then "true", otherwise leave the value blank. ===Has Cover Art At, Has Lyrics At, and Has Score At Relationship Types===9 KB (1,478 words) - 04:42, 13 December 2010
- {| class="wikitable sortable" width="80%" !Advanced Relationship11 KB (1,669 words) - 07:50, 15 January 2023
- ...meaning inherited (except [[rt:ca8d3642-ce5f-49f8-91f2-125d72524e6a|Parts Relationship Type]], that would be too recursive). # Adding a new page [[Work/Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees]], with the text on the main page14 KB (2,115 words) - 22:27, 28 August 2016
- ...roposal: ''[[Proposal:Work/Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees|RFC-339 Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees]]'' (2011/October) ...roposal]]: [[Proposal:Work/Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees|RFC-339 Relationship Inheritance in Works Trees]]).10 KB (1,515 words) - 19:18, 10 March 2016
- Since [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s have a hiera ...leaseArtistRelationship]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s or [[Artist Track Relationship|ArtistTrackRelationship]]<code><nowiki></nowiki></code>s:14 KB (2,417 words) - 22:48, 10 November 2011
- appropriate to this class of release. and a recording-to-recording relationship (which currently has to be added in the recording's4 KB (552 words) - 18:28, 28 May 2013
- ...es (indeed that leads to not allowing performance ARs and other [[Advanced Relationship Type|AdvancedRelationshipType]]s to be used for releases any more but only ...d Relationships|AdvancedRelationship]] from the [[Performance Relationship Class|PerformanceRelationshipClass]].7 KB (1,057 words) - 20:27, 25 October 2011
